Showing posts with label stringludology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label stringludology. Show all posts
Strings@50🎂
When🕓: 2020
Where🗺: online
Ready. Set. Takeoff!🚀
Join me for a walkthrough of some major advancements in String Theory from its first fifty (50) years, while unleashing the third revolution of innovation.
← 1970 - 2020
Hello🍪 →
(see also Venus Colloquia, 🥚Eggheads)
Creator: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
[pronunciation "/url/"]
Egglepple® :== 🧑🏿lnq's portfolio* and middle name. ** As in porting from one directory of the 🍃leaf (recto) to the other directory (verso) of some function space. On the basis of quoting, fault tolerance increases with each proof and is infinite when completely solved (/totally sequenced).
Statistically, it is the animorphic (ie. to STU^n) tape of leaf🍃 definitions (literally "🥚egg leaf🍃 ↔ epp leaf🍃"), and subjectively^ the cellspace (SMALL∪BIG ⊂ Stewniverse) spooling both ends of any generic 26-measure signal; but, mathemusically, the minor and major scales. ^^ Egglepple is what we are imaging (by stewcing/vending its calculus, STU, via gameplay. To make a Humpty Dumpty allusion, we break up the brane into finite pieces, only to put it back together again continuously.).
In terms of cell structure [:= 🔋polarized membrane] - Egglepple represents automata (ie. totality of circuitry between the cell membrane), itself an automaton (UUelcome). Ludologically, its kindergarten describes aspects of the braneworld.
"Egglepple is the ultimate puzzle🧩. It's like playing 26-dimensional ♟️chess in a spreadsheet." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Egglepple is a portfolio of puzzles🏁, itself a puzzle🧩.
(Not to be confused with The Egglepple Company. See The Origamic Symphony🎶, koala8, "Egglepple, everywhere!", 📓Egglepple: Unfolded, 🎞️Egglepple: The Mathemagical World, Joey Koala🐨, Puwun, Stewniverse, yoyo, UUelcome, 🔋e:e statistics, quantumquotient, UUhistlegrass, stewc, STU, united under Egglepple, UUe, 🧑🏿lnq's Starting Five, 🧑🏿lnq's walk, 🧑🏿lnq's motif, 🧑🏿lnq nomenclature, mathemusic, Egghead/🥚Eggheads, #Egglepple@30)
/// +Joey Koala is the official mascot and Puwun the unofficial mascot of Egglepple.
+"Egglepple" was invented and coined by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy.🤓 The word is also part of his name (...he wanted a name history would remember when he "had created the greatest portfolio of all-time").😉 (see 🧑🏿lnq nomenclature)
+To phonetically distinguish it from the name itself, the kindergarten/portfolio aspect of Egglepple is pronounced like 'egg·ul·epp·ul' (cf. the old 'Peggy from Margaret' conundrum).
+For those wondering why Egglepple has such a juvenile presentation, it's because the portfolio was founded/created when I was a little kid, and I intentionally never bothered maturing it in that regard (hence, the kindergarten). It was at this founding point that I pretty much committed to living full-time in my own world.
+The color scheme for the 'E-g-g-l-e-p-p-l-e' logo is a nod to the original team colors for the Miami Dolphins
🐬 🏈football franchise of the National Football League (NFL). The Miami Dolpins are the only team with aquatic (cf. Pisces♓) representation.
I kickstarted this on my twelfth birthday. Having somebody who believes in you can take you farther, and there's no convincing me otherwise. As the story goes, my sixth grade teacher, Mr. Woodring (without a doubt the best school teacher🍎 ever), picked me up from my house on my birthday and showed me around Washington, D.C. that evening. On the way home, he encouraged me to save my work (some of my doddles) in hopes of one day having something to present to the world that I could be proud of. That is the gist of how the portfolio came to be.
Back in my elementary school days, I took a keen interest in puzzling🧩 (generally solving them, along with maze designs of my own imagination), which likely stemmed from both being an avid 🎮video gamer and personal mathematical curiosities. Each activity helped me to get 'lost' (a personality thing of mine, and something every kid needs in their development).
Pronounced "earl", the word/name "Egglepple" itself didn't come about (I made it up) until the end of the century, although most of the other elements of the portfolio were already in place by then.
Function map: preimage ← Egglepple → image ⇔ UUelcome
A stewc - a mathemusical measure - :== an iterated perturbation* (sesquilinear transform) to some group of stews.** ie. ultrametric calculus To stewc
is to proof some twistorspace with (an) STU encryption [more accurately, to encode STU onto a brane (tape)].
Stewcing will summon a redeemable option (the coupon) on a continuous event that is predetermined. In this case, stewcs are proxies for the statistical variance of tablature complexity, and serve to hedge some handicap. Stewcs themselves generate UUe's cryptohash (provided from seigniorage on coupons); being synonymous with coin insertion [deposit] for traditional jukebox activation and dispensing.
/// It may be the case that the leaves SSS and UUU can/should be replaced by SST and UUT, respectively. This is because SSS and UUU actually are loop➰ markers (marking initiation and termination) in a sequence. Adjacent leaves cannot be coupled due to the fact that a chord (three leaves or more) is required for folding.
Within the context of stew choreography, a stewc is a play that is symmetry-breaking (to some walk) but not an endgame move, which means that it does not include: (1) the coupling of adjacent leaves, or (2) the leaves SSS and UUU [(namely (SSS,UUU) / (UUU,SSS)] in coordination. Failing to adhere to this rule would result in dissonance.
Out of the total twenty-six (26), only twenty-four (24) of them allow legal stewcs. This stems from the fact that a composition cannot lack harmony, which is to say that a loop (connected endpoints), nor adjacencies (any side-by-side coordinates) are permissible. (see Stewc Lemma, stewc tax, stewc notation, stewc button, jukepot, stewc field)
/// The sequence of leaves in a stewc is immune to start/stop identification. Meaning that it is not illegal to have an opus be of identical lettering (eg. "Opus LL").
Theorist: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
The quantumquotient (Q♭/Q♯) [abbreviated→QQ], or, in the context of stewcing, "how to typeset", axiomatizes an algebraic curvature 🔓/rootkey - the quantum (Q♭) of The Origamic Symphony🎶 (Q♯) - for computing some ratio (hyper/hypo)^ of ¢ents🪙 with which it is idempotent (ie. establish a charge → cryptocurrent).@@ The theorem (itself a macro ctf🏁) was first posed by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy, who, in suggesting QQ is provable, conjectured that token-based automata is ideally both kernelized and fungible.🤓 ^^ May colloquially be refered to as '🧑🏿lnq's eyes' (see 🧑🏿lnq's motif).
"Statistically, you cannot generate data without using energy. Also, there is no such thing as non-virtual data generation. Corollary: all virtual data is generated statistically." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Information occupies finite cells; in any data exchange, cryptocurrency is at play. So, objectively, desired is compressed data to yield maximal current.
A lemma of Q♭ seeks to exploit (with gameplay) the fitness of 🔋e:e statistics [a saturated load-balancing from twistor residues].### ∃ a transactor between preimaging and imaging. -- Problem: show that ¢ent🪙 homotopy is normalizable. Hint: classifying all fonts should suffice.
/// +The definition of quantum here = 'economically dyadic'.
+To control compliancy.
+The overall objective is to find (+exploit) the fonts. Coverages are used to 'trap' them, whilst classifying 0-bubbles qualifies as brute-force sorting. So, basically, it's fonts vs. foam.
+The hypothetical solution is to resolve the Juke Lemma (ie. fully sequence EGP). QQ can be proven (shown to be true) with identities.
"A QQ proof is like having the masterkey🔑 to the Universe. Someone armed with it can literally charge the world." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Think of the proof as being like some sort of an engine that powers twistorspace.
Overview
The quantumquotient always assumes crypto abnormalcy~ (ie. hyper/hypo < 1, and P ≅ BQP).~~ statistical volatility Plainly, it is a query into how much (an estimate) of a given distribution of e:e statistics [hyper/hypo] is optimal (ie. MONEY)(?). In a parimutuel system, the hyper- numerator can remain (hypothetically) asymptotic* iff there exists a hash function (auction) that can bring about perpetual normalization.** This is because the set of fonts is infinitesimal compared to the total fibor count.
The aim is for a collapsible wave function: persistent/redundant cache-credit idempotence (global cryptocurrent), which [(hyper,hypo) ≅ crypto] would be theoretically achievable with a secure🔐 [sequenced == all 2,028 fonts identified] payload (courtesy of u-u economics). (See Stewc Lemma, stewc tax, string ludology, UUelcome, Starbureiy automaton, The Origamic Symphony🎶, 🧑🏿lnq's Requiem, +list. Compare fusion energy gain factor)
Function map: Q ... Stewc Lemma → ... Pink Poem → γ-proof
loopstring➿, or l-string, :== a string of unstereotyped pencils✏️. Technically, l-string is a sesquilinear random coiling* of a 1-brane (which is) concatenated to and from specified reading frames (egg and epp), and subject to certain conditions (such as being gameplay-compliant).** As some measure of twistorspace.
The string may be open🔓 or closed🔒, but is closed by default (hence the term 'loop➰'). In fact, the main objective of each opus is to twist some variation of this object into a functionally unique fibor. (compare loop quantum gravity)
/// +In the context of the whole of string theory, the loopstring may colloquially be referred to as "toy string". We must be careful, however, to not confuse this "toy string" or its ludology (SL) with bosonic string theory (which is considered a "toy model" for which to introduce string theory education).
+I named it "loopstring" from 'loopy quanta' plus 'superstring', even though both terms are misnomers.
An argument can be made that l-string is a rudimentary automaton. It is hypothesized that all games are (or any game can be) based on and around some primitive manifestation of this object. Hence, when we want to study the ludology of any phenomenon, we could start with a drawn loopstring➿, and proceed from there. (see stew)
closed🔒 string (more accurately, closed coil) :== a string state with no open🔓 circuitry (does not have endpoints; forms a loop➰).
All game-related strategies (goals) are devised to obtain a closed string (thereby solving and validating it as some fibor, although the game itself may still be open) via folding. (see zero-bubble, loop➰)
/// Actually, there is no loop➰ requirement for a string to be closed (not open), since the end of the string must attach to a (mem)brane (even if that membrane is the string's other endpoint). Therefore, the yield is derived when in that a string is closed, but only by acoustic approximation.
zero-bubble (also written as "0-bubble" or "0b_$") or "lock" :== a bubble shapeframe (stereogram*) with no inflatons (scalar fields responsible for blowup from a single point [0-brane]).** Greater than or equal to three (3) spatial dimensions.
A 0b is a type of homeomorphism [map reduction] as a totally twisted loop➰ (ie. integration in twistorspace down to one ¢ent🪙), and formally marks the end of a proof.🔲→🎯 (see goal, open string, identity, stew, crypto, MONEY)
/// The supposition for 'zero' (+/-) is that when tabulating the yield, all spots on the mesh which would allow for an opening, vanish (0,0).
Locks are the ideal [most secure🔐] ¢ent🪙 structures [signed certificates] for a closed🔒 string, as measured by absolute compliance to its handicap. Ludologically, they are part of the endgame [statistical inference to egg(+) or epp(-)]. Taken by themselves as 'flags'🏁, zero-bubbles (frictionless assets = spread(0)) are considered solved puzzles🧩 (ie. completely mapped/encrypted/melodic/folded) when it comes to stewcing. {input = output, /return = [0]}
Function map: open string → stew choreography → lock → fibor
link :== coupler of two or more objects. Topologically, a link is a non-intersecting collection of knots🪢. A link is also a single element comprising a chain. -- Additionally, it refers to a discrete brane 'hyperlinked' to other branes in some cellular automata scheme.
/// Likewise, we can describe a knot as a link with one (1) component.
--------
Metrically, a link* (symbol: L) :== the pip of a stew (as measured in cents🪙) -- our derived cryptocurrent unit^ in stewcing, assuming money-energy🔋 equivalence). ** Named after 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy. ^^ Links are combinatoric.
As 💱spreadable@ crypto🧩, a link (Q♭) :== minima fibor as a control [fret = 0.000384615385¢~ (≈ ≤ $1.00 cap)] in trades. @@ ie. strategies get extrapolated to other fibors. ~~ ie. 1/26 of initial penny fret to get $1.00. This is our Q♯🎶 entrée [part of the standard opening for encryption], which acts as the default (however interchangeable) ballet🩰 on UUelcome's rotisserie.
(see +list, QQ, 🧑🏿lnq, stew, stewc tax, residue, token, MONEY, penny fret, toy, font, c@$#tag, 🧑🏿lnq's bubblegum)
walk :== some playable* spacetime complex folding algorithm (sequence of finite steps at fixed lengths).** Ludologically, some progression and its contrapuntal motion.
This is a plot/flow (ie. curvature) of a nut's path (a type of circuit as it would traverse the braneworld, indicative of current) with stochastic activity at specified movements (opening→middlegame→endgame). In all probability, walks chart a statistical distribution of their entropy (random variables transforming twistorspace).
/// Walks (as circuits) nessarily end in a charge (Q).
In proof theory, there are three (3) stages to a walk: (1) coil, (2) graphics, and (3) mesh.
We use walks as parse arguments in juking [stew choreography]. (see 🧑🏿lnq's walk, thread, sport, Pink Poem, route, tip, UUelcome)
/// In automation, walks are approximate source directives.
Function map: preimage → walk → image
bubblegum :== the name given to (a preimage of) fibor that is not optimal* (ie. false vacua).** Basically, not MONEY. It is/are (the class of) string combinations (yesegalo + groove/melody) whose fibril noncommutativity necessitate optimization (ornamenting of fugal themes).
We define bubblegum to be our "dilated vector space having everywhere-vanishing blowup points with boundary", and can easily determine it from being 'that which shares no equivalence relation with some assigned twistorspace (||inf > (u,u)=0|| OR ||sup < (u,u)=0||)'.
Bubblegum is used in encryption - as an improvisation method/tool to make MONEY - in hedging a given handicap [when bubblegum * (n) {n is finite number of pieces as ¢ents🪙} = handicap, then MONEY = yes], and thus, changing the tempo. (see 🧑🏿lnq's bubblegum, fibor bundle, swap, link. Compare protein quaternary structure)
/// +Bubblegum is probabilistically caused from half-integer statistics.
+'Bubblegum' is a metaphorically cohesive polymer, used to 'patch' things up so that MONEY can be made. Think of it (in a way) similar to bubblegum 'on the bottom of your shoe👟' that can be used to seal a leak, so to speak. (see spread)
Function map: bubblegum → improvise → MONEY
Theorist: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
Lemma: All phenomena* is stewcable.** Statistically-speaking, these are branes 0-25 simultaneously occupying the same quantum state of Egglepple.
The Lemma (as Q♭ logic) purports that the activity of stewcing (within the framework of a jukebox, namely UUelcome) is a most efficient attempt at satisfying the criterion for stereotyping STU.
Assuming scale-agnostic load modulation, it branches from the axiom that quantacommodization is /-root-authenticated/tolerated within stewc field [ring 0]. Being that stewcing is a non-terminating program, (shifting) kernel compliancy is sufficient Lemma resolution. (see QQ, Egglepple, everywhere!, string ludology, MONEY algorithm)
/// Efficiency is determined from the time complexity of stewcing. Twistorspace is curvilinear [sesquilinear], so it is implied that either approach (loop➰ or string) will eventually arrive at the same result (loopstring➿).
Function map: quantumquotient ⊃ Stewc Lemma ↔ Pink Poem → UUelcome