Showing posts with label proof. Show all posts
Showing posts with label proof. Show all posts
stube notation (sn, rhetorically called a verse) :== the instrument-agnostic, language-independent, easy-to-decipher verbalization of some stewc assignment as meant for proof. In signing, the alphanumeric notation is essentially low-level symbolic "play code"*; an algorithm devised to instruct the jukebox on how, when, and what to type in stereo [stew choreography].** Referred to as a track (for tracing some token).
The Stewdio is the designated instrument for generating, reading, routing, and interpreting stube notation. (See hologram, c@$#tag, touch-and-go, γ-proof, thread, stewc field. Compare genetic code, musical notation)
/// Stube notation was devised by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy.🤓
Theorist: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
The quantumquotient (Q♭/Q♯) [abbreviated→QQ], or, in the context of stewcing, "how to typeset", axiomatizes an algebraic curvature 🔓/rootkey - the quantum (Q♭) of The Origamic Symphony🎶 (Q♯) - for computing some ratio (hyper/hypo)^ of ¢ents🪙 with which it is idempotent (ie. establish a charge → cryptocurrent).@@ The theorem (itself a macro ctf🏁) was first posed by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy, who, in suggesting QQ is provable, conjectured that token-based automata is ideally both kernelized and fungible.🤓 ^^ May colloquially be refered to as '🧑🏿lnq's eyes' (see 🧑🏿lnq's motif).
"Statistically, you cannot generate data without using energy. Also, there is no such thing as non-virtual data generation. Corollary: all virtual data is generated statistically." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Information occupies finite cells; in any data exchange, cryptocurrency is at play. So, objectively, desired is compressed data to yield maximal current.
A lemma of Q♭ seeks to exploit (with gameplay) the fitness of 🔋e:e statistics [a saturated load-balancing from twistor residues].### ∃ a transactor between preimaging and imaging. -- Problem: show that ¢ent🪙 homotopy is normalizable. Hint: classifying all fonts should suffice.
/// +The definition of quantum here = 'economically dyadic'.
+To control compliancy.
+The overall objective is to find (+exploit) the fonts. Coverages are used to 'trap' them, whilst classifying 0-bubbles qualifies as brute-force sorting. So, basically, it's fonts vs. foam.
+The hypothetical solution is to resolve the Juke Lemma (ie. fully sequence EGP). QQ can be proven (shown to be true) with identities.
"A QQ proof is like having the masterkey🔑 to the Universe. Someone armed with it can literally charge the world." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Think of the proof as being like some sort of an engine that powers twistorspace.
Overview
The quantumquotient always assumes crypto abnormalcy~ (ie. hyper/hypo < 1, and P ≅ BQP).~~ statistical volatility Plainly, it is a query into how much (an estimate) of a given distribution of e:e statistics [hyper/hypo] is optimal (ie. MONEY)(?). In a parimutuel system, the hyper- numerator can remain (hypothetically) asymptotic* iff there exists a hash function (auction) that can bring about perpetual normalization.** This is because the set of fonts is infinitesimal compared to the total fibor count.
The aim is for a collapsible wave function: persistent/redundant cache-credit idempotence (global cryptocurrent), which [(hyper,hypo) ≅ crypto] would be theoretically achievable with a secure🔐 [sequenced == all 2,028 fonts identified] payload (courtesy of u-u economics). (See Stewc Lemma, stewc tax, string ludology, UUelcome, Starbureiy automaton, The Origamic Symphony🎶, 🧑🏿lnq's Requiem, +list. Compare fusion energy gain factor)
Function map: Q ... Stewc Lemma → ... Pink Poem → γ-proof
(digital) signature :== a server-side authenticator in a proof-of-work scheme.
[Do not confuse with key signature, time signature.]
Because each opus/fibor has an intentical ¢ent🪙 value associated with its image, only a finite number of ¢ents🪙 can be allocated to a signee (ie. stewcer). Such game logic (cassette+certificate+token) designation requires genuine digital validation/verification before or so push/pull requests can be approved for transaction (known as securing🔐). Otherwise, an object is subjected to double-spending, or a user can hypothetically create counterfeit (non-injective) assets - hijack the platform to forge proof - which is fraudulent and disallowed. (see stewc notation, coupon)
/// Signatures, manifested in tutti progression, are ultimately a means for reducing rotisserie stress.
As a further integrity measure, this data is defaulted to the ledger (as public information).
Function map: patch → γ-proof → cassette → signature → UUelcome
tutti ("all together") :== the recombination of all cryptographical kernel components [stereotypography, operation, integer asymptotics, and ludology (SOIL) hashes] into a signal. (see cassette)
Function map: tutti → UUhistlegrass
ludology :== the logic of games. As it is important to stereotyping, this would be strategy leading to proof [strategy→proof] in relation to some walk.
A person who simulates and/or creates (models) games is called a ludologist (with certain restrictions applied, this same person may also be called a gamer). (also of interest link, gameplay, gameshow, game theory, opera ludo)
For ludological consideration, any game requires the interplay of three (3) things ("rules"): 1) a player, 2) string, and 3) rhetoric.
/// +A simplest definition would be "the charting of currency". Something more formal would be that our game logic is that of "sorting algorithms pertaining to twistorspace".
+Our game engine responds directly to calls (the "payload").
+The field is not the same as game theory, which moreso studies strategies in particular. Ludology, on the otherhand, encompasses all aspects of stewcing [especially game mechanics and (methods of) gamification].
+Ludology does not necessarily promote physics; it is possible that our games may not calibrate potential energy functions (such as force fields). In its stead, models and simulations are promoted with automation.
yesegalo proof, or γ-proof (or just proof), :== a stewcing algorithm mapping some preimage to its image. Proofing substantiates a fibor, thereby providing (its) identity clarification.!!! While also helping us draw up better heuristics. The opposite of a proof is an error. Each proof involves patching two (2) genera in T: yesegalo↔🍄meshroom.^^^ A framework for conduction: does a ballet groove with(in) the Symphony🎶?
γ-proofing tasks: determine the efficiency of an EGP encryption [ie. solve the given puzzle🧩; is the resulting fibor economical (fit within the handicap)|(u,u)=0|?].
The proof itself is scored* as a stereotype (sequenced shapeframe) in some overall random walk.** Proofs of stewc input are published (to the ledger) in stewc notation.
The end🏁 of a proof (solution) should result in the closing🔒 of a string (eg. 0b), ideally a fibor. We endeavor to find the most secure🔐 proofs by improving upon the bounds on classes of twistors. Doing so aids our MONEY-making. (see stewc notation, crypto, mathematical proof, proof.m)
/// As with the traditional printing press, the primary reason for proofing is to provide confirmation/verification that a job (done) is accurate. Doing so draws a consensus (from independent, third-party sources -- read: stewcers) for the creation of a new standard. It is important to note that proofs are unique (ie. duplication is forbidden on the circuit). All proofs are published to the ledger.
Function map: loopstring➿ → γ-proof → MONEY → quantumquotient
mathematics :== an ambiguous way to prove or disprove ideal behaviors of objects.
/// An 'open story of counting', it must be said that mathematical methodology is a cumulative effort (ie. rigorously built atop previous checks).
As libraries* for computing functions, mathematicians use its models to formulate theories/theorems/identities/errata.** We acknowledge the so-called 'Big Five (5)' active areas in mathematics to be [1-5 labeled alphabetically]: algebra [1], analysis [2], arithmetic [3], geometry [4], and music [5]. As far as I am concerned, the basis of math is stewcing. (see mathemusic, mathletics, recreational mathematics, mathematical model, Mathilda, 📓So, you want to be a mathematician?, The Mathemagician, Opus Solve, physics, information science, game, cryptosport, 🧩puzzle)
"The essence of mathematics is not proof, but conjecture." - lnq🧑🏿
/// +There are three (3) classes of mathematics: pure, applied, and recreational (pure,applied ∈ recreational). This definition covers all three (3), and may be referred to as polymathematics. A mathematician is someone who advances classical mathematics.
+In my line of work, I think of so-called 'recreational mathematics' as a type of (among other considerations) reverse engineering, where we are re-creating known structures/models for study and understanding. As an example, in 🧩puzzle solving, I may take a known and solved (from means other than stewcing) macromolecule (eg. protein), and stewc that fibor so that it can identified+databased. (see also Pajamas)
+Mathematics is a type of low-technology, as well as being its own industry.
----------
#LEGEND
math.AG (algebraic geometry), math.AT (algebraic topology), math.AP (analysis of partial differential equations), math.CT (category theory), math.CA (classical analysis and ordinary differential equations), math.CO (combinatorics), math.AC (commutative algebra), math.CV (complex variables), math.DG (differential geometry), math.DS (dynamical systems), math.FA (functional analysis), math.GM (general mathematics), math.GN (general topology), math.GT (geometric topology), math.GR (group theory), math.HO (history and overview), math.IT (information theory), math.KT (k-theory and homology), math.LO (logic), math.MP (mathematical physics), math.MG (metic geometry), math.NT (number theory), math.NA (numerical analysis), math.OA (operator algebras), math.OC (optimization and control), math.PR (probability), math.QA (quantum algebra), math.RT (representation theory), math.RA (rings and algebras), math.SP (spectral theory), math.ST (statistics theory), math.SG (symplectic geometry)
/stew choreography [neuroinformatics]
The art of stew choreography :== the process of stereotyping* (brane-folding) STU using fruut to keyframe [sequence/map by linking] stews.** Print the portfolio as a sponge. This is our "proof-of-work"~ concept [ie. stewcing exercise for 'meshing' UUelcome's cryptocommodity (¢ents🪙)], and should solve twistorspaces (via encryption).~~ And/Or 'proof-of-space'.
Per gameplay, stew choreography (or dribbling [endpoint control]&) forms a ➿loopstring's middlegame (ie. walk). The Stewdio is used natively [default] for improvising.&& String command. (see stewc notation, ballet🩰, Stewniverse, touch-and-go, 🧑🏿lnq's walk, joey)
/// +stew choreography is a type of animation (interpolation of frames).
+Such choreography is inferred by "the ballet of The Origamic Symphony🎶". The reason this ballet is necessary is to anticipate dividends. We say that stew choreography is "to γ-proof l-string".
+Any proof-of-work must be validated with a signature/handshake.
+Every single stew on a loopstring must be affected for a yield to be accurate.
Function map: random coil → stew choreography → fibor
fibor bundle (a function of taxation and/or renormalization) :== two (2) or more fibors combined/connected, which itself forms another fibor. This is Egglepple's quaternary isoform. (see 💱swap, bubblegum, hyperlink, minor scale, major scale, coverage, foam)
Function map: minor scale → major scale → fibor → fibor bundle
In general, crypto refers to a 🧩puzzle that lends itself to a cipher (some unsecured🔓 function space secured🔐 by an algorithm or quantum phenomena). By definition, its reward function, if any, is backed by proof-of-work or proof-of-space.
/// +Technically, it's the proof-of-work that makes something crypto.
+We assume that such a function space is insecure🔓 (randomized), and crypo exists to stabilize it.
As it specifically relates to UUelcome, crypto is a synonym for 'statistical estimation to an actual yield' (¢ent🪙-energy🔋 conversion), as calculated from the ¢ent🪙 formula and its hash complexities. Stewcing helps ensure fitness (ie. core efficiency) [:= data compression relative to spontaneous egg-epp reactivity🔋 ≜ (file size vs. energy usage)]. (see cryptocommodity, cryptocurrency, cryptosport, crypto compliance, crypto normalization, mathematics, bug)
/Pink Poem [algorithm compile]
The Pink Poem :== classes of algorithms* that optimize stewcing ludology [ie. kernelized push movements (opening→middlegame→endgame)] for predicting Egglepple's imagery from its preimagery.** Calls+declarations for string improvisation.++Each poem (or 'pink') [a genetic algorithm / genetic algebra] is its own complete verse (ie. proof of the quantumquotient) leading to fibor closure🔒. (see 🧑🏿lnq's Starting Five, .uue, UUhistlegrass, touch-and-go, opera, patch, cassette🧱, QQ, MONEY algorithm)
/// +It is called a "pink poem" just because 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy liked how that color [RGB:255,0,100] (I call it watermelon🍉) looked on the design of the UUelcome Matte (and for the matching letter p's😉).
+The Pink Poem is the recital (concert) program.
+Pinks share a common gameplay directive with link.