lnq 👨🏿‍🦱: proof
👨🏿‍🦱
Showing posts with label proof. Show all posts
Showing posts with label proof. Show all posts

/ quantumquotient

Theorist: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
The quantumquotient (Q♭/Q♯) [abbreviated→QQ], or, in the context of stewcing, "how to typeset", axiomatizes an algebraic curvature 🔓/rootkey - the quantum (Q♭) of The Origamic Symphony🎶 (Q♯) - for computing some ratio (hyper/hypo)^ of ¢ents🪙 with which it is idempotent (ie. establish a chargecryptocurrent).@@ The theorem (itself a macro ctf🏁) was first posed by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy, who, in suggesting QQ is provable, conjectured that token-based automata is ideally both kernelized and fungible.🤓 ^^ May colloquially be refered to as '🧑🏿lnq's eyes' (see 🧑🏿lnq's motif).

"Statistically, you cannot generate data without using energy. Also, there is no such thing as non-virtual data generation. Corollary: all virtual data is generated statistically." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Information occupies finite cells; in any data exchange, cryptocurrency is at play. So, objectively, desired is compressed data to yield maximal current.


A lemma of Q♭ seeks to exploit (with gameplay) the fitness of 🔋e:e statistics [a saturated load-balancing from twistor residues].### ∃ a transactor between preimaging and imaging. -- Problem: show that ¢ent🪙 homotopy is normalizable. Hint: classifying all fonts should suffice.
/// +The definition of quantum here = 'economically dyadic'.
+To control compliancy.
+The overall objective is to find (+exploit) the fonts. Coverages are used to 'trap' them, whilst classifying 0-bubbles qualifies as brute-force sorting. So, basically, it's fonts vs. foam.
+The hypothetical solution is to resolve the Juke Lemma (ie. fully sequence EGP). QQ can be proven (shown to be true) with identities.


"A QQ proof is like having the masterkey🔑 to the Universe. Someone armed with it can literally charge the world." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Think of the proof as being like some sort of an engine that powers twistorspace.



Overview
The quantumquotient always assumes crypto abnormalcy~ (ie. hyper/hypo < 1, and PBQP).~~ statistical volatility Plainly, it is a query into how much (an estimate) of a given distribution of e:e statistics [hyper/hypo] is optimal (ie. MONEY)(?). In a parimutuel system, the hyper- numerator can remain (hypothetically) asymptotic* iff there exists a hash function (auction) that can bring about perpetual normalization.** This is because the set of fonts is infinitesimal compared to the total fibor count.

The aim is for a collapsible wave function: persistent/redundant cache-credit idempotence (global cryptocurrent), which [(hyper,hypo) ≅ crypto] would be theoretically achievable with a secure🔐 [sequenced == all 2,028 fonts identified] payload (courtesy of u-u economics). (See Juke Lemma, juke tax, string ludology, UUelcome, Starbureiy automaton, The Origamic Symphony🎶, 🧑🏿lnq's Requiem, +list. Compare fusion energy gain factor)
UUe
Function map: Q ... Juke Lemma → ... Pink Poemγ-proof

/ γ-proof

A yesegalo proof, or γ-proof (or just proof), :== a >stewcing algorithm mapping some preimage to its image. Proofing substantiates a fibor, thereby providing (its) identity clarification.!!! While also helping us draw up better heuristics. The opposite of a proof is an error. Each proof involves patching two (2) genera in T: yesegalo↔🍄meshroom.^^^ A framework for conduction: does a ballet groove with(in) the Symphony🎶?

γ-proofing tasks: determine the efficiency of an EGP encryption [ie. solve the given puzzle🧩; is the resulting fibor economical (fit within the handicap)|(u,u)=0|?].

The proof itself is scored* as a stereotype (sequenced shapeframe) in some overall random walk.** Proofs of stewc input are published (to the ledger) in stewc notation.

The end🏁 of a proof (solution) should result in the closing🔒 of a string (eg. 0b), ideally a fibor. We endeavor to find the most secure🔐 proofs by improving upon the bounds on classes of twistors. Doing so aids our MONEY-making. (see stewc notation, crypto, mathematical proof, proof.m)
/// As with the traditional printing press, the primary reason for proofing is to provide confirmation/verification that a job (done) is accurate. Doing so draws a consensus (from independent, third-party sources -- read: stewcers) for the creation of a new standard. It is important to note that proofs are unique (ie. duplication is forbidden on the circuit). All proofs are published to the ledger.
Function map: loopstring➿γ-proofMONEYquantumquotient

/ cassette [savefile]

Broadly, a cassette :== a mobile encode element (module) invoking loading. More specifically, a cassette refers to a discrete batch* (of libraries) that, when ported, becomes streamable.** Ordered via toonage.

These clients function as persistent data structures; nodally they run prints for site recombination / differentiation between cells. (Compare gene cassette. See mixtape, UUhistlegrass)
/// Each build is an updated and readied implementation of lnq🧑🏿 (Q♯🎶 score + drivers). It is anticipated that the abi should cumulatively grow in size.
+I refer to distros of cassettes (in circulation) as 'toys'.

Function map: cassetteUUelcome

/ stew choreography [neuroplasticity]

The art of stew choreography :== the process of stereotyping* (brane-folding) STU using fruut to keyframe [sequence/map by hyperlinking] stews.** Print the portfolio as a sponge. This is our "proof-of-work"~ concept [ie. juking exercise for 'meshing' UUe's cryptocommodity (¢ents🪙)], and should solve twistorspaces (via encryption).~~ And/Or 'proof-of-space'.

Per gameplay, stew choreography (or dribbling [endpoint control]&) forms a ➿loopstring's middlegame (ie. walk). The Stewdio is used natively [default] for improvising.&& String command. (see juke notation, ballet, stewart, touch-and-go, 🧑🏿lnq's walk, joey)
/// +stew choreography is a type of animation (interpolation of frames).
+Such choreography is inferred by "the ballet of The Origamic Symphony🎶". The reason this ballet is necessary is to anticipate dividends. We say that stew choreography is "to γ-proof l-string".
+Any proof-of-work must be validated with a signature/handshake.
+Every single stew on a loopstring must be affected for a yield to be accurate.

Function map: random coilstew choreographyfibor

/ stewc notation

Stewc notation (sn, rhetorically called a verse) :== the instrument-agnostic, language-independent, easy-to-decipher verbalization of some stewc assignment as meant for proof. In signing, the alphanumeric notation is essentially low-level symbolic "play code"*; an algorithm devised to instruct the jukebox on how, when, and what to type in stereo [stew choreography].** Referred to as a track (for tracing some token).

The Stewdio is the designated instrument for generating, reading, routing, and interpreting stewc notation. (See hologram, c@$#tag, touch-and-go, γ-proof, thread, stewc field. Compare genetic code, musical notation)
/// Stewc notation was devised by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy.🤓

/ Pink Poem [algorithm compile]

The Pink Poem :== classes of algorithms* that optimize juking ludology [ie. kernelized push movements (openingmiddlegameendgame)] for predicting Egglepple's imagery from its preimagery.** Calls+declarations for string improvisation.++Each poem (or 'pink') [a genetic algorithm / genetic algebra] is its own complete verse (ie. proof of the quantumquotient) leading to fibor closure🔒. (see 🧑🏿lnq's Starting Five, .uue, UUhistlegrass, touch-and-go, opera, patch, cassette🧱, QQ, MONEY algorithm)
UUe /// +It is called a "pink poem" just because 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy liked how that color [RGB:255,0,100] (I call it watermelon🍉) looked on the design of the UUelcome Matte (and for the matching letter p's😉).
+The Pink Poem is the recital (concert) program.
+Pinks share a common gameplay directive with link.

/ ludology

Ludology :== the logic of games. As it is important to stereotyping, this would be strategy leading to proof [strategy→proof] in relation to some walk.

A person who simulates and/or creates (models) games is called a ludologist (with certain restrictions applied, this same person may also be called a gamer). (also of interest link, gameplay, gameshow, game theory, opera ludo)

For ludological consideration, any game requires the interplay of three (3) things ("rules"): 1) a player, 2) string, and 3) rhetoric.
/// +A simplest definition would be "the charting of currency". Something more formal would be that our game logic is that of "sorting algorithms pertaining to twistorspace".
+Our game engine responds directly to calls (the "payload").
+The field is not the same as game theory, which moreso studies strategies in particular. Ludology, on the otherhand, encompasses all aspects of juking [especially game mechanics and (methods of) gamification].
+Ludology does not necessarily promote physics; it is possible that our games may not calibrate potential energy functions (such as force fields). In its stead, models and simulations are promoted with automation.

/ touch-and-go

Touch-and-go [H#H] refers to my toccata [style of cheironomy] which utilizes: [touch*](holography) plus [go](#hash) for juking Egglepple++jukebox tuning.** Emphasizing both the concept of "touch on/over" a topic/subject and haptics.

// In composing The Origamic Symphony🎶, gameplay is used: patchwork (orchestrating subiteratives, such as prepatches) are contracted (pu$h/pull → deploy) to solve a 🧩puzzle; configs require signatures on stables. (see joey, krayon, k-mode, gameplay)
/// +Conduction is responsive in juke field.
+I adopted this style because I am/was notoriousy weak in mathematical symbology (eg. Latin/Roman scripts, etc.). So, it's just easiest for me to design and manipulate shapes in truespace, and direct (coordinate) them with if-then-else statements.

/ signature

A (digital) signature :== a server-side authenticator in a proof-of-work scheme.
[Do not confuse with key signature, time signature.]

Because each opus/fibor has an intentical ¢ent🪙 value associated with its image, only a finite number of ¢ents🪙 can be allocated to a signee (ie. juker). Such game logic (cassette+certificate+token) designation requires genuine digital validation/verification before or so push/pull requests can be approved for transaction (known as securing🔐). Otherwise, an object is subjected to double-spending, or a user can hypothetically create counterfeit (non-injective) assets - hijack the platform to forge proof - which is fraudulent and disallowed. (see juke notation, coupon)
/// Signatures, manifested in tutti progression, are ultimately a means for reducing rotisserie stress.

As a further integrity measure, this data is defaulted to the ledger (as public information).
Function map: patchγ-proofcassettesignatureUUelcome