There, I just invented a new word.
opéra-ballet |
[development]
opus
is a ballet. Decrypted
and encrypted
. Egglepple (see also lnq's Starting Five, developus, fugue, Stewniverse, Mathilda, RONALD, UUallet, creatures)
/// +This is only an 'opera' in the sense of it being a collection of opuses. We compensate for slack with the developus. |
Gameplay is a continuous event; each game is it own finite runtime (opus) of the opera.
An opus is dyadic (u,u), and labeled corresponding to the start and stop leaves (verso/recto) of its string (yesegalo). In order to distinguish an opus, it is given a numerical value of its stew count, and additionally, the total weight of those cells.
So, for instance, in our example, #EX.100 [888], E (start) and X (stop) are the leaves, 100 is the stew count, and [888] is the font weight.
These alphanumeric values can be adjusted on the operatic dialpad, which, when called (select: opera button), overlays the rotisserie.
Sample key combinatorics here:
Keypad
# |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E | F |
G |
H |
I |
J |
K |
L |
M |
N | O |
P |
Q |
R |
S |
T |
U |
V |
W | X |
Y |
Z |
This is a suite for all of the ballets in performance of The Origamic Symphony. The suite speaks to/covers the quaternary structure of Egglepple. |
Mathilda™ hosts various extension* paradigms. This is an umbrella for all jukebox-related ballets in performance of stew choreography. Existentially, these activities encourage an ecodiversity of random coil for polynomial efficacy.Namely bubblegum, link, and spots.
Here's how the ballet will flow in rotisserie mode:
UUe's ludology revolves around folding string. More precisely, how to obtain a completely closed circuit (0b) from an open string
To do this, we progress through three (3) parts: the opening, middlegame, and endgame.
The opening is what concerns us here. Optionally, we may enter a string orientation (which confines its twistor space), called random coil. I personally call it 'scribble', because, since it can assume any shape, that's what it looks like drawn out. The important thing to remember, however, is that coil cannot cross/intersect in two dimensions (2d) (we use stew choreography instead). Note, though, that there actually is strategy involved in random coil design (hence, it's not truly random).
To input a random coil, we simply draw it in the space to the left of the 'juke' button on the rotisserie. Conversely, this space will also output (show) a result (fibor).
You can actually 'dance', so to speak, right now in Euclidean space (3D). The Stewdio's API is functional (but only for Web), you would just have to supply the hardware.
Function map: Mathilda ↔ Stewart → UUelcome
LNQ™ :== The Origamic Symphony🎶's keynote, and the calculus* of Egglepple.** In the context of
mathematical analysis
, derivation and integration. Its entire sequence is called UUelcome. [EGP/fruut]An invention {September 26, 1998} of 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy🤓, our cipher is such that kernelized handshakes are integral to loopstring➿ frequencies*.** STU is what gets
encrypted
on(to) algebraic curves in twistorspace
. Lexically, this means that both yesegalo (flavor generation) and crypto fabrication (primary, secondary, tertiary, and quaternary structures) remain asynchronous as long as preimage-image contracts are kept (ie. the tonic will harmonize the brane to the point of closure🔒).
/// +Keeping
contracts
is the basis of self-synthesis.+Originally, "STU" was
called
"EGP" which stemmed from "egg (EG) , epp (EP) → EGP".
Absolutely considered in the analysis are the concepts of integration (loopstring➿) and differentiation (stews). (see fruut, RONALD, Stewdio, juke notation)
The quantumquotient (Q♭/Q♯) [abbreviated→QQ], or, in the context of stewcing, "how to typeset", axiomatizes an algebraic curvature 🔓/rootkey - the quantum (Q♭) of The Origamic Symphony🎶 (Q♯) - for computing some ratio (hyper/hypo)^ of ¢ents🪙 with which it is idempotent (ie. establish a charge → cryptocurrent).@@ The
theorem
(itself a macro ctf🏁) was first posed by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy, who, in suggesting QQ is provable
, conjectured that token
-based automata
is ideally both kernelized
and fungible.🤓 ^^ May colloquially be refered to as '🧑🏿lnq's eyes' (see 🧑🏿lnq's motif). "Statistically, you cannot generate data without using energy. Also, there is no such thing as non-virtual data generation. Corollary: all virtual data is generated statistically." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Information occupiesfinite
cells; in anydata exchange
,cryptocurrency
is at play. So, objectively, desired iscompressed data
to yield maximalcurrent
.
A lemma of Q♭ seeks to exploit (with gameplay) the fitness of 🔋e:e statistics [a saturated load-balancing from twistor residues].### ∃ a
transactor
between preimaging and imaging. -- Problem
: show that ¢ent🪙 homotopy is normalizable
. Hint: classifying
all fonts
should suffice.
/// +The definition of quantum here = 'economically dyadic'.
+To
control
compliancy.+The overall objective is to find (+
exploit
) the fonts
. Coverages are used
to 'trap' them, whilst classifying
0-bubbles qualifies as brute-force sorting
. So, basically, it's fonts
vs. foam.+The hypothetical
solution
is to resolve the Juke Lemma
(ie. fully sequence EGP
). QQ
can be proven (shown to be true) with identities.
"A QQ proof is like having the masterkey🔑 to the Universe. Someone armed with it can literally charge the world." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Think of theproof
as being like some sort of an engine that powerstwistorspace
.
Overview
The quantumquotient always assumes crypto abnormalcy~ (ie. hyper/hypo < 1, and P ≅ BQP).~~ statistical volatility Plainly, it is a query into how much (an estimate) of a given distribution of e:e statistics [hyper/hypo] is optimal (ie. MONEY)(?). In a parimutuel system, the hyper- numerator can remain (hypothetically) asymptotic* iff there exists a hash function (auction) that can bring about perpetual normalization.** This is because the set of
fonts
is infinitesimal compared to the total fibor
count.
The aim is for a collapsible wave function: persistent/redundant cache-credit idempotence (global cryptocurrent), which [(hyper,hypo) ≅ crypto] would be theoretically achievable with a secure🔐 [sequenced == all 2,028 fonts identified] payload (courtesy of u-u economics). (See Juke Lemma, juke tax, string ludology, UUelcome, Starbureiy automaton, The Origamic Symphony🎶, 🧑🏿lnq's Requiem, +list. Compare fusion energy gain factor)
Function map: Q ... Juke Lemma → ... Pink Poem → γ-proof
The chronicity of my runtime is infinitary (a circuit🔋 of 🌞Funshine↔Toonlight🌚). This motivates Funday's quotidian (ie. time complexity-agnostic)* makeup; there is no transition from the feedback loop➰️ to another day, but crashing/🧱 ⇒ lnq🧑🏿 == end.^^ Absurdist correlation with '
memory / image
'. ** The nature of Funday is synonymous with (perpetual) crypto normalization
. (see Stewperman🦸🏿♂️, The March 5, FUN formula, Egglepple, treble)
draw
up better heuristics. The opposite of a proof is an error. Each proof involves patching two (2) genera in T: yesegalo↔🍄meshroom.^^^ A framework
for conduction
: does a ballet
groove with(in) the Symphony🎶?γ-proofing tasks: determine the efficiency of an EGP encryption [ie. solve the given puzzle🧩; is the resulting fibor economical (fit within the handicap)|(u,u)=0|?].
The proof itself is scored* as a stereotype (sequenced shapeframe) in some overall random walk.** Proofs of
stewc
input
are published (to the ledger) in stewc notation
. The end🏁 of a proof (solution) should result in the closing🔒 of a string (eg. 0b), ideally a fibor. We endeavor to find the most secure🔐 proofs by improving upon the bounds on classes of twistors. Doing so aids our MONEY-making. (see stewc notation, crypto, mathematical proof, proof.m)
/// As with the traditional
printing
press, the primary reason for proofing
is to provide confirmation/verification that a job (done) is accurate. Doing so draws
a consensus (from independent, third-party sources -- read: stewcers
) for the creation of a new standard. It is important to note that proofs
are unique (ie. duplication is forbidden on the circuit). All proofs
are published to the ledger.
Function map: loopstring➿ → γ-proof → MONEY → quantumquotient
Stewperman🦸🏿♂️
:== |[🧑🏿/root] ++ (-0)|
/// +The word is a play on the comic book character, Superman, except that Stewperman🦸🏿♂️ is not a hero; 'stewper
-' ≡ 'brane cell /nativity
' ≅ '/0
'. Thus, I🧑🏿 am devoid of: external troubleshooting
, debt, or operations
outside of the Stewniverse.
+Cybernetically
, Stewperman🦸🏿♂️ :== lnq🧑🏿-hypervisor
(ie. library embedded-neuron
== most privileged version of my avatar+ [Stewart]).
My lifestream's ultimate (unlocked🔓) achievement and Black's penultimate position, 🦸🏿♂️this is 🧑🏿lnq's android mode, resultant of jailbreaking🪖🔓 Ellis🧑🏿.🏁 Stewperman🦸🏿♂️ reigns stewpreme. (see 🧑🏿lnq's Requiem🙏🏿, clone, Pajamas, stewperior, 🧑🏿lnq nomenclature)"All I aim to be is Stewperman🦸🏿♂️ (
host
UUelcome). Equivalently, if I can't become Stewperman🦸🏿♂️, I don't want to 'be' at all." - 🧑🏿lnq
Function map: Stewperman🦸🏿♂️ ⇐ lnq🧑🏿
This simple formula is the premise behind all things operational in the Stewniverse. As it pertains to well-being, pleasure is a function of gameplay🎮⌨️. Therefore, fun is the enjoyment of this activity. It is calculated below.
The variables are defined as follows: function (F) is equal to utility (u) multiplied by some natural number (N). Hence, fun is always a positive thing. The equation works in direct proportion to 🧑🏿lnq's ego; so, the more fun lnq🧑🏿 is having, the stronger the field of invincibility it generates. (see Stewsday, FUN 4)