/MONEY💰

Inventor: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
MONEY™💰 (Mathemusically-Optimized* Normal Encrypted Yield) :== the cryptic resultant [hyper/hypo ≥ 1] from γ-proofing (some permutation of BIG branes).** Efficiency (ie. fitness) is determined by proximity to the handicap _{(||inf ≥ (u,u)=0||)} relative to how many tokens are used.
/// This is a separate phylum (fungible) of cryptocurrency (cachecredit).

"You need BIG branes to make MONEY💰." - 🧑🏿lnq

Numismatically, MONEY💰 is fit fibor (strict tertiary structure) earned [reward] by stubing. After attaining a 0-bubble, the yield is the attribution of ¢ents🪙 drawn from that loopstring➿ arrangement. A fibril requirement is that the yield be less than or equal to the handicap (ie. commutativity) for MONEY💰 qualification. Otherwise, it is bubblegum [yield ≤ handicap, else bubblegum].^{^}^^ However, fibor bundling can still objectively make MONEY💰 via improvisation. (see font, link, lyric, mesh, Juke Lemma, c@$#tag, common ¢ents🪙, quotient normalization, cryptosport, 💰MONEY algorithm)
/// The total ¢ent🪙 amount is finite (per each opus), while the tabulation of jukers and their scores relative to an opus can never be greater than the available ¢ents🪙. This helps prevent double-spending.
Function map: session → γ-proof → ¢ents🪙/link

/random coil

Ludologically, the function of opening🔓 a loopstring➿ is processed seemingly random (random := state=yes ++ address=no).
/// As in each outcome has equal probability.

random coil :== the lowest-level [dim≤1] (unmapped) orientation of a brane. This unstructured position sample [an algebraic curve] is known* as its preimage (or illustrative state for both pitch and incidental tax determinance).** I label it 'scramble' or sometimes 'scribble'.

Instead of being a specific shape/pose, it is a statistical distribution of all populated conformations (albeit, strictly those lacking subunit definition). If each conformation (walk) has equal probability or weight, then such coil is the acoustically-approximated bounds of some twistorspace. (compare denaturation, contrast identity, thread)
/// +It is not uncommon to have multiple different coil(s) for the same opus/string.
+The orientation is that of algebraic curvature because topologically, random coils are random walks on curved surfaces. My given axiom is that encryption can be hidden in its algebra.
Function map: scribble → sponge

/quantumquotient (QQ)

Theorist: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
The quantumquotient (Q♭/Q♯) [abbreviated→QQ], or, in the context of stewcing, "how to typeset", axiomatizes an algebraic curvature 🔓/rootkey - the quantum (Q♭) of The Origamic Symphony🎶 (Q♯) - for computing some ratio (hyper/hypo)^{^} of ¢ents🪙 with which it is idempotent (ie. establish a charge → cryptocurrent).@@ The theorem (itself a macro ctf🏁) was first posed by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy, who, in suggesting QQ is provable, conjectured that token-based automata is ideally both kernelized and fungible.🤓 ^^ May colloquially be refered to as '🧑🏿lnq's eyes' (see 🧑🏿lnq's motif).

"Statistically, you cannot generate data without using energy. Also, there is no such thing as non-virtual data generation. Corollary: all virtual data is generated statistically." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Information occupies finite cells; in any data exchange, cryptocurrency is at play. So, objectively, desired is compressed data to yield maximal current.

A lemma of Q♭ seeks to exploit (with gameplay) the fitness of 🔋e:e statistics [a saturated load-balancing from twistor residues].^### ∃ a transactor between preimaging and imaging. -- Problem: show that ¢ent🪙 homotopy is normalizable. Hint: classifying all fonts should suffice.
/// +The definition of quantum here = 'economically dyadic'.
+To control compliancy.
+The overall objective is to find (+exploit) the fonts. Coverages are used to 'trap' them, whilst classifying 0-bubbles qualifies as brute-force sorting. So, basically, it's fonts vs. foam.
+The hypothetical solution is to resolve the Juke Lemma (ie. fully sequence EGP). QQ can be proven (shown to be true) with identities.

"A QQ proof is like having the masterkey🔑 to the Universe. Someone armed with it can literally charge the world." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Think of the proof as being like some sort of an engine that powers twistorspace.

Overview
The quantumquotient always assumes crypto abnormalcy^~ (ie. hyper/hypo < 1, and P ≅ BQP).~~ statistical volatility Plainly, it is a query into how much (an estimate) of a given distribution of e:e statistics [hyper/hypo] is optimal (ie. MONEY)(?). In a parimutuel system, the hyper- numerator can remain (hypothetically) asymptotic* iff there exists a hash function (auction) that can bring about perpetual normalization.** This is because the set of fonts is infinitesimal compared to the total fibor count.

The aim is for a collapsible wave function: persistent/redundant cache-credit idempotence (global cryptocurrent), which [(hyper,hypo) ≅ crypto] would be theoretically achievable with a secure🔐 [sequenced == all 2,028 fonts identified] payload (courtesy of u-u economics). (See Stewc Lemma, stewc tax, string ludology, UUelcome, Starbureiy automaton, The Origamic Symphony🎶, 🧑🏿lnq's Requiem, +list. Compare fusion energy gain factor)

Function map: Q ... Stewc Lemma → ... Pink Poem → γ-proof

/signature

(digital) signature :== a server-side authenticator in a proof-of-work scheme.
[Do not confuse with key signature, time signature.]

Because each opus/fibor has an intentical ¢ent🪙 value associated with its image, only a finite number of ¢ents🪙 can be allocated to a signee (ie. stewcer). Such game logic (cassette+certificate+token) designation requires genuine digital validation/verification before or so push/pull requests can be approved for transaction (known as securing🔐). Otherwise, an object is subjected to double-spending, or a user can hypothetically create counterfeit (non-injective) assets - hijack the platform to forge proof - which is fraudulent and disallowed. (see stewc notation, coupon)
/// Signatures, manifested in tutti progression, are ultimately a means for reducing rotisserie stress.

As a further integrity measure, this data is defaulted to the ledger (as public information).
Function map: patch → γ-proof → cassette → signature → UUelcome

/melody

Cryptographically, a melody :== a commuted* walk.** Relative to the handicap.
/// +Similarly, because fonts predict conflation between a countable number of loopstring➿, opuses giving the same fret may also be considered in this definition.
+This is part of a game's de facto/standard middlegame. Melodies provide a general (scale-agnostic) template for feasible tertiary structure design. (+groove)
If a strategy works (that is, its proof of supersymmetry reveals a fibor or fibor bundle [lyric]), then that encrypted coil [stereo structure] is said to be melodic. (see stew, groove, meshroom🍄)
Function map: groove ↔ melody

/tutti

tutti ("all together") :== the recombination of all cryptographical kernel components [stereotypography, operation, integer asymptotics, and ludology (SOIL) hashes] into a signal. (see cassette)

Function map: tutti → UUhistlegrass

/puzzle🧩

puzzle🧩 :== an object or objective lending itself to ludological inference [preimage→image] (ie. all puzzles beg to be solved*; a solved puzzle is in itself considered a goal).** Decrypted and/or encrypted. Someone who composes/solves puzzles may be referred to as a puzzler.

Stewcing-wise, our puzzles are ctf🏁-styled asymmetric rondos in a three (3)-act continuum: bug-bid-bounty = arithmetic+algebra(curvature)+analysis(logarithm). (see puzzle script, Puzzle Punk, gameshow, Egglepple, crypto)
/// Mathemusical translation: intonation, melody, and measure.

/yesegalo

yesegalo :== the flavors and their generational assignment to flageolet pencils✏️. Mathemusically, it is a "textural arpeggio". This is a game's barebone opening (its initial move, used cybernetically to control coiling).

Yesegalo (γ) is quanta of an STU chromascheme* that is non-migrant to Egglepple. Each set is subject to encryption (γ-proofing). This is the prime part of a game's opening [minor scale].** Yellow, blue, and green.
/// Yesegalo would be part of a game's opening that is set by 🧑🏿lnq (Black), as opposed to the random coil which is usually drawn by another juker (White).

Flavors
Function map: yesegalo → γ-proof → stew

/γ-proof

yesegalo proof, or γ-proof (or just proof), :== a stewcing algorithm mapping some preimage to its image. Proofing substantiates a fibor, thereby providing (its) identity clarification.^!!! While also helping us draw up better heuristics. The opposite of a proof is an error. Each proof involves patching two (2) genera in T: yesegalo↔🍄meshroom.^{^}^^ A framework for conduction: does a ballet groove with(in) the Symphony🎶?

γ-proofing tasks: determine the efficiency of an EGP encryption [ie. solve the given puzzle🧩; is the resulting fibor economical (fit within the handicap)_|(u,u)=0|?].

The proof itself is scored* as a stereotype (sequenced shapeframe) in some overall random walk.** Proofs of stewc input are published (to the ledger) in stewc notation.

The end🏁 of a proof (solution) should result in the closing🔒 of a string (eg. 0b), ideally a fibor. We endeavor to find the most secure🔐 proofs by improving upon the bounds on classes of twistors. Doing so aids our MONEY-making. (see stewc notation, crypto, mathematical proof, proof.m)
/// As with the traditional printing press, the primary reason for proofing is to provide confirmation/verification that a job (done) is accurate. Doing so draws a consensus (from independent, third-party sources -- read: stewcers) for the creation of a new standard. It is important to note that proofs are unique (ie. duplication is forbidden on the circuit). All proofs are published to the ledger.
Function map: loopstring➿ → γ-proof → MONEY → quantumquotient

/stewcing [neuroinformatics]

Ludologically, (the mind sport of) stewcing (formally stew choreography) :== the demonstration, control, and/or improvising of a particular stewc [ie. the hash exercise of securing🔒 twistorspace by probing its acoustic bounds (with error detection/correction)].

The appliance for doing such is a jukebox. Someone who does so is called a stewcer. Pertaining to UUelcome, stewcing - a form of cryptography - is of bugger (ctf🏁-style) 'cryptosport'* logic.** see mathletics Complexity-wise, token duration is between P and E, with proofing orchestrated in curvilinear space (T).
/// I like to say that stewcing is brute force mathematics as 'an exercise in optimization from auction theory'.

To stewc is to summon a redeemable option (the coupon) on a continuous event that is predetermined [to at least one (1) party]. In this case, stewcs are proxies for the statistical variance of the tablature complexity, and serve to hedge some handicap. Stewcs themselves generate cachecredit (provided from seigniorage on coupons); being synonymous with 🪙coin insertion [deposit] for traditional jukebox activation and dispensing.
Juking was invented by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy.🤓👌🏿

According to string ludology, stewcing is reflexive to u-u economics; making the optimization of the electrolyte🔋 the foundation of our pursuit. The overall intent behind stewcing is to image Egglepple (ie. stewcing is the preferred method for sequencing STU).
/// +Because stewcing is injective, the stewcer absolutely keeps what is earned (minus any fees).
+Fibor classification requires twistorspace manipulation, which is the basis of stew choreography.

The process of stereotyping is done by encrypting/encoding STU onto a brane (stewc = pencil✏️ ↔ glyph). This is accomplished using stew choreography. stewcing is considered to be economically fair (ie. games are randomized and thus no one has an advantage), that is, risk:payoff ≪ payoff:risk. (see Pink Poem, mathemusic, touch-and-go, s-surface)
/// Sans pure 'penny' frets, the value of a stewc is always rounded up to the next integer (unless the stewc itself is an integer). Example: a tablature divisor of 0.054... becomes a 6 ¢ent fret. This seigniorage ensures the house always stays afloat.

/mathemusic

Formulator: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
mathemusic :== the functional conflation of brane classes defined as 'an incorporation of keys and timing to perturb a sinusoidal, whose resultant is a γ-proof'.

This tends more towards being a supermathematical exercise grounded in the principles of music theory. However, it is practically expressing (with libretti) statistics in the framework of 🎵music (even sans sonically). Cryptologically, it is the algorithmic direction of variation*.** Solutions have melodic texture.

When we speak of mathemusic, we are generally doing so in the context of The Origamic Symphony🎶/Egglepple. (see ballet🩰, opera, ¢ent🪙, joey, mathletics, 🧑🏿lnq's Starting Five, 3-rex, fibor, UUe, stewc notation, QQ)

"All I hear is mathematics. All I see is music." - lnq🧑🏿

/// Contemporary mathemusic was originally formulated by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy (its progenitor).🤓

/Starbureiy certification

A Starbureiy certificate ("Starbureiy certified") is bestowed upon an individual or institution once they have satisfied a specific cryptographic key (ie. courseware(s) completion). (see also ed, +list)

/Matilda

Composer: Link Starbureiy

ornamentation

[recapitulation]