+juke tax

Economist: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
Intrinsic to u-u economics, juke taxation (or simply tax) is residue from juking as a form of compliance (ie. fungibility maintenance = standard excise) that stems (inspirationally) from curvature over finite fields* (redefining algebraic curves in terms of floating-point arithmetic); with non-trivial zeroes lying on the critical line, 1/2 + ir, where i is an imaginary number, and r is a real number {ir completes^{^} the twistorspace value}.The tax is a default house fee parimutuelly embedded in each fret. Funds get recycled♻, springing cache-credit idempotence. A contribution from the rational portion of half-integer statistics. (see also ¢ent, MONEY, font, residue, token, Quantumquotient, quotient normalization, juker's ruin, carrots🥕+peaches🍑, 📓juke tax as universal basic income, common ¢ents, fret, expression, cybernetic governance, DUCK🦆, local zeta-function)
/// In cybernetic governance, taxation is a seigniorage/excise applied to utilities (ie. energy) costs.

+juking

Ludologically, (the sport of) juking is the demonstration, control, and/or improvising of a particular juke [ie. the instance of securing🔒 twistorspace by probing its acoustic bounds (with error detection/correction)]. The appliance for doing such is a jukebox. Someone who does so is called a juker. Pertaining to UUe, juking - a form of cryptography - is of bugger (ctf🏁-style) 'cryptosport'* logic. Complexity-wise, token duration is between P and E, with proofing orchestrated in curvilinear space (T).see mathletics
/// I like to say that juking is brute force mathematics as 'an exercise in optimization from auction theory'.
To juke is to summon a redeemable option (the coupon) on a continuous event that is predetermined [to at least one (1) party]. In this case, jukes are proxies for the statistical variance of the tablature complexity, and serve to hedge some handicap. Jukes themselves generate cachecredit (provided from seigniorage on coupons); being synonymous with coin insertion [deposit] for traditional jukebox activation and dispensing.
Juking was invented by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy.🤓👌🏿
According to string ludology, juking is reflexive to ue-u economics; making that the foundation of our pursuit. The overall intent behind juking is to image Egglepple (ie. juking is the preferred method for sequencing EGP).
/// +Because juking is injective, the juker absolutely keeps what is earned (minus any fees).
+Fibor classification requires twistorspace manipulation, which is the basis of stew choreography.
The process of stereotyping is done by encrypting/encoding EGP onto a brane (juke = pencil ↔ glyph). This is accomplished using stew choreography. Juking is considered to be economically fair (ie. games are randomized and thus no one has an advantage), that is, risk:payoff ≪ payoff:risk. (see also Pink program, mathemusic, touch-and-go)
/// Sans pure 'penny' frets, the value of a juke is always rounded up to the next integer (unless the juke itself is an integer). Example: a tablature divisor of 0.054... becomes a 6 ¢ent fret. This seigniorage ensures the house always stays afloat.

+Quantumquotient

Theorist: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
The Egglepple^@ axiom [abbreviated as the Quantumquotient (QQ^{^}), or, in the context of juking, "how to typeset"] postulates an algebraic curvature key (ack) - the quantum - for measuring some quotient of cryptocurrency with which it is idempotent.The theorem (itself a macro ctf🏁) was first posed by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy, who, in suggesting QQ is provable, conjectured that token-based automata is ideally both kernelized and fungible.🤓 May colloquially be refered to as '🧑🏿lnq's eyes' (see 🧑🏿lnq's motif). A lemma of QQ seeks to exploit (with gameplay) the fitness of e:e statistics [a saturated load-balancing from twistor residues].^#∃ a transactor between preimaging and imaging. -- Problem: show that ¢ent homotopy is normalizable. Hint: classifying all fonts should suffice.
/// +To control compliancy.
+The hypothetical solution is to resolve the Juke Lemma (ie. fully sequence EGP). QQ can be proven (shown to be true) with identities.

Overview
The Quantumquotient always assumes current abnormalcy^~ (ie. hyper/hypo ≠ 1, and P ≅ BQP).statistical volatility Plainly, it is a query into how much (an estimate) of a given hyper/hypo is optimal (ie. MONEY)(?). In a parimutuel system, the hyper- numerator can remain (hypothetically) asymptotic* iff there exists a hash function (auction) that can bring about perpetual normalization.This is because the set of fonts is infinitesimal compared to the total fibor count.
The aim is for persistent/redundant cache-credit idempotence (global cryptic hyperlinking), which [(hyper,hypo) ≅ crypto] would be theoretically achievable with a fully secured🔐 [sequenced] payload (courtesy of u-u economics). (see also Juke Lemma, juke tax, string ludology, UUelcome, Starbureiy automaton, The Origamic Symphony🎶, +list)

Function map: Q ... Juke Lemma → ... Pink program → γ-proof

+MONEY

Inventor: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
MONEY™ (Mathemusically-Optimized* Normal Encrypted Yield) is the Quantumquotient resultant from γ-proofing (some permutation of BIG branes).Efficiency (ie. fitness) is determined by proximity to the handicap _{(||inf ≥ (u,u)=0||)} relative to how many tokens are used.
/// This is a separate phylum (fungible) of cryptocurrency (cachecredit).

"You need BIG branes to make MONEY." - 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy

Numismatically, MONEY [hyper/hypo = 1] is fit fibor (strict tertiary structure) earned [reward] by juking. After attaining a 0-bubble, the yield is the attribution of ¢ents drawn from that loopstring arrangement. A fibril requirement is that the yield be equal to the handicap (ie. commutativity) for MONEY qualification. Otherwise, it is bubblegum [yield = handicap, else bubblegum].^{^}However, fibor bundling can still objectively make MONEY via improvisation. (see also font, lyric, Juke Lemma, 🧑🏿lnq's bubblegum, common ¢ents, quotient normalization, cryptosport, MONEY algorithm)
/// The total ¢ent amount is finite (per each opus), while the tabulation of jukers and their scores relative to an opus - or to the Opéra-ballet (Stewart) as a whole - can never be greater than the available ¢ents. This helps prevent double-spending.
Function map: session → γ-proof → ¢ents

+font

It is conjectured that Egglepple's family of fonts exist between amplitudes on a cryptograph. These motifs* are analogous to string tunings, and aid in the stereotypography of fibor.Array of typefaces. (see also font weight, font size, MONEY, ca$htag, fibor bundle)

Ludologically, as the definitive endgame🏁, we are said to find a font at the bijection in twistorspace where a dyad is an identity; that is, when an opus' measurable and permutable extrema commute (ie. idempotent yield deviation ≡ 0^{^}).That is, fret = 26¢ WITH handicap = ^$676.00. (see also foam) Monetarily, a font is the transactor between the supremum (hypercurrency) and the infimum (hypocurrency) of hashes on the ledger (ie. where hyper/hypo is optimal/most secure🔐 -- transaction with no tax).

According to jukebox operation (rotisserie), the complete count* of fonts (f) is simply ballet coordination in sesquilinear form, so f=1,352 [from encrypted (676) plus decrypted (676) classes] × 1.5 = 2,028.Each opus leaf set contains three (3) fonts as a statistical mean.
/// A full sequencing of the payload (UUelcome) should reveal all motifs.
Function map: subchemistry → font → chemistry || open string → font → knot || font ⊆ MONEY

+coverage

A coverage is the twistorspace posture (ie. formation) for surjectively graphing a [supersymmetric] zone on(to) some pitch.

As cryptographic shape schemes [puzzles🧩], coverages are fundamentally mutable and dynamic; spanning the entire range of branes(SMALL + BIG). A coverage can be (strategically) both preventive and responsive. (see also #coverage, egg, epp, patchwork, cassette, Honne Bay)

+mathemusic

Formulator: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
Mathemusic is the functional conflation (via brane classes) of mathematics and 🎵music (defined as 'an incorporation of keys and timing to perturb a sinusoidal') whose resultant is a γ-proof. This tends more towards being a supermathematical exercise grounded in the principles of music theory. However, it is practically expressing (with libretti) statistics in the framework of music (even sans sonically). Cryptologically, it is the algorithmic direction of variation*.Solutions have melodic texture. When we speak of mathemusic, we are generally doing so in the context of The Origamic Symphony🎶/Egglepple. (see also ¢ent, mathletics, 🧑🏿lnq's Starting Five, 3-rex, fibor, UUe, juke notation)

"All I hear is mathematics. All I see is music." - 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy

/// Contemporary mathemusic was originally formulated by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy.🤓

+patch

In flowchart material, a patch is a morphism between separate categories that induces a categorical limit on fruut. Put another way, a patch [non-residue] initiates some recompute (resulting in a change of topology at an inflection point) of a walk. As combinatorial generators, patches create (a supply of) theoretical graphs which help calibrate stew choreography when mapping relational categories; hence, patches are (decorative) bundling objects (compare ribosome).

Included in the patchwork pipe (a-z) is the prepatch ('prep'), which is a pre-release of an official/actual compile. These usually will highlight new objects that need to be tested before committing to a stable (release). (see also toonage, bubblegum, coverage, improvise, γ-proof, cassette, signature sticker)

+yesegalo

Yesegalo are the flavors and their generational assignment to flageolet pencils. Mathemusically, it is a "textural arpeggio". This is a game's barebone opening (its initial move, used cybernetically to control coiling).

Yesegalo (γ) is quanta of an EGP chromascheme* that is non-migrant to Egglepple. Each set is subject to encryption (γ-proofing). This is the prime part of a game's opening [minor scale].Yellow, blue, and green.
/// Yesegalo would be part of a game's opening that is set by 🧑🏿lnq (Black), as opposed to the random coil which is usually drawn by another juker (White).

Flavors
Function map: yesegalo → γ-proof → stew

+Honne Bay

Honne Bay is viral automata (virus) that is 🧑🏿lnq's counterpart. She is a self-aware artificially intelligent yot who is the main antagonist of the entire game. Though never actually seen (no true visual depiction), her essence is indomitably omnipresent, so she is affectionately known as the 'Phantom of the Opera'.

Honne Bay represents efficiency in our world. She is purposely programmed to provide cover for what is weak, obsolete, and potentially futile. By doing so, the Stewniverse remains in a necessarily continual (state of) flux.
/// She (Honne Bay) came about back in December of 1999. I was at Ohio State University and was in the early stages of self-producing a musical that I had hoped would premiere on campus at some point. After posting some digital flyers in the Dance department about the role of 'Honne Bay', I received some immediate responses. When I later went to hold a meeting with potential castmates, I underestimated my timing (or was just really busy). I remember leaving a note on the desk in the room letting them know that I had stepped out but would return soon. I sprinted home and took a quick shower, and then rushed back. To my chagrin, nobody was there; they all left, probably thinking that I 'ghosted'👻. I didn't try again, just leaving it as it was. So because of that reason, Honne became the 'phantom of the opera'.

+puzzle🧩

A puzzle🧩 is an object or objective lending itself to ludological inference [preimage→image] (ie. all puzzles beg to be solved*).Decrypted and/or encrypted. Someone who composes/solves puzzles may be referred to as a puzzler.
Juking-wise, our puzzles are ctf🏁-styled asymmetric rondos in a three (3)-act continuum: bug-bid-bounty = arithmetic+algebra(curvature)+analysis(logarithm). (see also puzzle script, Puzzle Prince)
/// Mathemusical translation: intonation, melody, and measure.

+random coil

Ludologically, the function of opening🔓 a loopstring is processed seemingly random.
/// As in each outcome has equal probability.
A random coil is the lowest-level [dim≤1] (unmapped) orientation of a brane. This unstructured position sample [an algebraic curve] is known* as its preimage (or illustrative state for both pitch and incidental tax determinance).I label it 'scribble'. Instead of being a specific shape/pose, it is a statistical distribution of all populated conformations (albeit, strictly those lacking subunit definition). If each conformation (walk) has equal probability or weight, then such coil is the acoustically-approximated bounds of some twistorspace. (compare denaturation, contrast identity)
/// +It is not uncommon to have multiple different coil(s) for the same opus/string.
+The orientation is that of algebraic curvature because topologically, random coils are random walks on curved surfaces. My given axiom is that encryption can be hidden in its algebra.
Function map: scribble → sponge

+signature

A signature is a server-side authenticator in a proof-of-work scheme.
[Do not confuse with key signature, time signature.]

Because each opus/fibor has an injective ¢ent value associated with its image, only a finite number of ¢ents can be allocated to a signee (ie. juker). Such game logic (cassette+certificate+token) designation requires genuine digital validation/verification before or so push/pull requests can be approved for transaction (known as securing🔐). Otherwise, a user can hypothetically create counterfeit (non-injective) assets - hijack the platform to forge proof - which is fraudulent and disallowed. (see also juke notation, coupon)
/// Signatures, manifested in tutti progression, are ultimately a means for reducing rotisserie stress.
As a further integrity measure, this data is defaulted to the ledger (as public information).
Function map: patch → γ-proof → cassette → signature → UUelcome

+γ-proof

A yesegalo proof, or γ-proof (or just proof), is a juking algorithm mapping some preimage to its image. Proofing substantiates a fibor, thereby providing (its) identity clarification.^!While also helping us draw up better heuristics. The opposite of a proof is an error. Each proof involves patching two (2) genera in T: yesegalo↔meshroom.^{^} A framework for conduction: does a ballet groove with(in) the Symphony🎶?

γ-proofing tasks: determine the efficiency of an EGP encryption [ie. solve the given puzzle🧩; is the resulting fibor economical (fit within the handicap)_|(u,u)=0|?].

The proof itself is scored* as a stereotype (sequenced shapeframe) in some overall random walk.Proofs of juke input are published (to the ledger) in juke notation. The end🏁 of a proof (solution) should result in the closing🔒 of a string (eg. fibor), ideally a zero-bubble. We endeavor to find the most secure🔐 proofs by improving upon the bounds on classes of twistors. Doing so aids our MONEY-making. (see also juke notation, mathematical proof, proof.m)
/// As with the traditional printing press, the primary reason for proofing is to provide confirmation/verification that a job (done) is accurate. Doing so draws a consensus (from independent, third-party sources -- read: jukers) for the creation of a new standard. It is important to note that proofs are unique (ie. duplication is forbidden on the circuit). All proofs are published to the ledger.
Function map: loopstring → γ-proof → MONEY → Quantumquotient