👨🏿🦱
Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label economics. Show all posts
"I have a magic jukebox." - 🧑🏿lnq
Inventor: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy | License: UUelcome
UUe® (aka 🧑🏿lnq's jukebox) :== client for stew choreography^. In streaming The Origamic Symphony🎶, it auctions + dispenses@ stews.~ ^^
Stereotype:=sequence+print. @@ A function of fugue extensibility. ~~ server actions
UUe is a kind of abstract cell. This [ |
/// +UUe was originally an acronym for 'United Under economy',later changed to 'united under Egglepple'. It no longer is an acronym; it's just 'UUe' (pronounced like "whee"). However, both 'United Under economy' and/or 'united under Egglepple' are still applicable.+UUe - a
mathematical model - qualifies as a jukebox by its rotisserie, with internal operations similar to those of a cell. Realization of its utility happens via the Stewdio.+Because u-u economics mandates that
clientele in the (u-u) scheme is part of a supply chain, UUe functions like a vending machine.+lnq is the (official) mascot of UUe. This is "
🧑🏿lnq's Jukebox".+In
gameplay, UUe is the house🏠.
united under Egglepple™|
united under Egglepple is the unofficial (yet formal) name for UUe. This is the kernel orchestrating u-u economics - systematic configuration* of the payload by auctioning% fibor(s) from the portfolio: [SSS = (micro) through UUU = (macro)], which leverages stewc taxation.%% A necessitation of compliance. This is to say that the whole of Egglepple (particularly the nuts) is 'statistically united'; a parimutuel system is extensible and potentially twistable (u,u).
Server operations are shelled using tokenage* for auctioning and gameplay.** Kernel development is an organic reaction to gameplay. Ludologically, this conversely implies that all disjoint games are variant. Put another way, yesegalo and 🍄meshroom are self-synthetic. (see UUelcome, u-u economics, .uue, UUe interface, Juke Lemma, patch, Pink program, braine🧠🗂, Quantumquotient, DUCC🦆, #recital, Stewdio)
/// It was originally a trust that has since morphed into something much more sophisticated; a shift similar to Egglepple being re-appropriated into the the jukebox.
Function map: UUe ↔ UUelcome → Pajamas
Economist: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
u-u economics* :== identifying stews with their parimutuelly Rubik [54-face]^ scrambles. ^^
Because in twistorspace everything is symmetrical and dyadic (u,u), our parimutuel system (ie. a cryptocurrent between links), is reliant on 🔋e:e statistics (the interplay between hypercurrency and hypocurrency). So, structurally, the whole industry of Egglepple [portfolio: recto (EEE) ↔ verso (PPP)] implies that stewcing leads to the creation of ¢ents🪙 (generator), thereby securing🔐 [via crypto] its circuitry. (see quantumquotient, 🧑🏿lnq's walk, crypto compliance, c@$#tag, zero-bubble)
/// By
+¢ents get recycled♻.
+We have an economy/economic system precisely because we are
Mechanics
Gameplay: (1) an asset (fibor) gets auctioned off until it becomes frictionless, (2) resultant cryptocurrency (links) is moved via c@$#tags.
In this economy (:= flow of transactions), the house (UUe) will 'purse' (and not 'bank') parimutuelly; transactions happen in curvilinear time (T).
Function map: fibor ⇒ UUelcome ← twist economics → quantumquotient
u-u economics* :== identifying stews with their parimutuelly Rubik [54-face]^ scrambles. ^^ Minimax of moves per solve. ** ie. forms a qubit. "In a scenario where your energy🔋 needs are growing, an 🔋energy budget is obliterated via tax rebate." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Not having (or removing) an energy🔋 budget is the fastest way toscaleKardashev.
Because in twistorspace everything is symmetrical and dyadic (u,u), our parimutuel system (ie. a cryptocurrent between links), is reliant on 🔋e:e statistics (the interplay between hypercurrency and hypocurrency). So, structurally, the whole industry of Egglepple [portfolio: recto (EEE) ↔ verso (PPP)] implies that stewcing leads to the creation of ¢ents🪙 (generator), thereby securing🔐 [via crypto] its circuitry. (see quantumquotient, 🧑🏿lnq's walk, crypto compliance, c@$#tag, zero-bubble)
/// By definition, a currency is valuable whence weight can be assigned to its proof-of-work.+¢ents get recycled♻.
+We have an economy/economic system precisely because we are
using a jukebox. Like with any vending machine, you can have whatever you want [demand] (as long as it is available [supply]), you just have to pay for it.
Mechanics
Gameplay: (1) an asset (fibor) gets auctioned off until it becomes frictionless, (2) resultant cryptocurrency (links) is moved via c@$#tags.
In this economy (:= flow of transactions), the house (UUe) will 'purse' (and not 'bank') parimutuelly; transactions happen in curvilinear time (T).
Function map: fibor ⇒ UUelcome ← twist economics → quantumquotient
A stewc - a mathemusical measure - :== an iterated perturbation* (sesquilinear transform) to some group of stews.** ie. 
is to proof some twistorspace with (an) STU encryption [more accurately, to encode STU onto a brane (tape)].
Stewcing will summon a redeemable option (the coupon) on a continuous event that is predetermined. In this case, stewcs are proxies for the statistical variance of tablature complexity, and serve to hedge some handicap. Stewcs themselves generate UUe's cryptohash (provided from seigniorage on coupons); being synonymous with coin insertion [deposit] for traditional jukebox activation and dispensing.
/// It may be the case that the
Within the context of stew choreography, a stewc is a play that is symmetry-breaking (to some walk) but not an endgame move, which means that it does not include: (1) the coupling of adjacent leaves, or (2) the leaves SSS and UUU [(namely (SSS,UUU) / (UUU,SSS)] in coordination. Failing to adhere to this rule would result in dissonance.
Out of the total twenty-six (26), only twenty-four (24) of them allow legal stewcs. This stems from the fact that a composition cannot lack harmony, which is to say that a loop (connected endpoints), nor adjacencies (any side-by-side coordinates) are permissible. (see Stewc Lemma, stewc tax, stewc notation, stewc button, jukepot, stewc field)
/// The sequence of
ultrametric calculus To stewc is to proof some twistorspace with (an) STU encryption [more accurately, to encode STU onto a brane (tape)]. Stewcing will summon a redeemable option (the coupon) on a continuous event that is predetermined. In this case, stewcs are proxies for the statistical variance of tablature complexity, and serve to hedge some handicap. Stewcs themselves generate UUe's cryptohash (provided from seigniorage on coupons); being synonymous with coin insertion [deposit] for traditional jukebox activation and dispensing.
/// It may be the case that the leaves SSS and UUU can/should be replaced by SST and UUT, respectively. This is because SSS and UUU actually are loop➰ markers (marking initiation and termination) in a sequence. Adjacent leaves cannot be coupled due to the fact that a chord (three leaves or more) is required for folding.
Within the context of stew choreography, a stewc is a play that is symmetry-breaking (to some walk) but not an endgame move, which means that it does not include: (1) the coupling of adjacent leaves, or (2) the leaves SSS and UUU [(namely (SSS,UUU) / (UUU,SSS)] in coordination. Failing to adhere to this rule would result in dissonance.
Out of the total twenty-six (26), only twenty-four (24) of them allow legal stewcs. This stems from the fact that a composition cannot lack harmony, which is to say that a loop (connected endpoints), nor adjacencies (any side-by-side coordinates) are permissible. (see Stewc Lemma, stewc tax, stewc notation, stewc button, jukepot, stewc field)
/// The sequence of leaves in a stewc is immune to start/stop identification. Meaning that it is not illegal to have an opus be of identical lettering (eg. "Opus LL").
>fitness :== the ability of crypto to be transacted across twistorspace (u,u) securely🔐 (ie. hyper/hypo ≤ 1 / as MONEY, not bubblegum). It implies a correct✅ fold structure (non-malform), and is absolute* between Egglepple's inflection points.** Complexity-agnostic
Fitness [:= data compression relative to spontaneous egg-epp reactivity] sustains net 🔋energy-scaling by providing 🧩puzzle insurance against risk of handicap interrupts, thus ensuring a fast net feedback loop➰.
/// As a rule-of-thumb, the bigger the deviation from the
Function map: gameplay → fitness → MONEY → cryptic normalization
Fitness [:= data compression relative to spontaneous egg-epp reactivity] sustains net 🔋energy-scaling by providing 🧩puzzle insurance against risk of handicap interrupts, thus ensuring a fast net feedback loop➰.
/// As a rule-of-thumb, the bigger the deviation from the handicap, the more obese (less fit) the sigma is. Yields greater or less than the handicap are deemed unfit. We generally accept closures🔒 within penny range [one (1) ¢ent🪙] as tight.
Function map: gameplay → fitness → MONEY → cryptic normalization
Theorist: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
The quantumquotient (Q♭/Q♯) [abbreviated→QQ], or, in the context of stewcing, "how to typeset", axiomatizes an algebraic curvature 🔓/rootkey - the quantum (Q♭) of The Origamic Symphony🎶 (Q♯) - for computing some ratio (hyper/hypo)^ of ¢ents🪙 with which it is idempotent (ie. establish a charge → cryptocurrent).@@ The
A lemma of Q♭ seeks to exploit (with gameplay) the fitness of 🔋e:e statistics [a saturated load-balancing from twistor residues].### ∃ a
/// +The definition of quantum here = 'economically dyadic'.
+To
+The overall objective is to find (+
+The hypothetical
Overview
The quantumquotient always assumes crypto abnormalcy~ (ie. hyper/hypo < 1, and P ≅ BQP).~~ statistical volatility Plainly, it is a query into how much (an estimate) of a given distribution of e:e statistics [hyper/hypo] is optimal (ie. MONEY)(?). In a parimutuel system, the hyper- numerator can remain (hypothetically) asymptotic* iff there exists a hash function (auction) that can bring about perpetual normalization.** This is because the set of
The aim is for a collapsible wave function: persistent/redundant cache-credit idempotence (global cryptocurrent), which [(hyper,hypo) ≅ crypto] would be theoretically achievable with a secure🔐 [sequenced == all 2,028 fonts identified] payload (courtesy of u-u economics). (See Stewc Lemma, stewc tax, string ludology, UUelcome, Starbureiy automaton, The Origamic Symphony🎶, 🧑🏿lnq's Requiem, +list. Compare fusion energy gain factor)
Function map: Q ... Stewc Lemma → ... Pink Poem → γ-proof
The quantumquotient (Q♭/Q♯) [abbreviated→QQ], or, in the context of stewcing, "how to typeset", axiomatizes an algebraic curvature 🔓/rootkey - the quantum (Q♭) of The Origamic Symphony🎶 (Q♯) - for computing some ratio (hyper/hypo)^ of ¢ents🪙 with which it is idempotent (ie. establish a charge → cryptocurrent).@@ The
theorem (itself a macro ctf🏁) was first posed by 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy, who, in suggesting QQ is provable, conjectured that token-based automata is ideally both kernelized and fungible.🤓 ^^ May colloquially be refered to as '🧑🏿lnq's eyes' (see 🧑🏿lnq's motif). "Statistically, you cannot generate data without using energy. Also, there is no such thing as non-virtual data generation. Corollary: all virtual data is generated statistically." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Information occupiesfinitecells; in anydata exchange,cryptocurrencyis at play. So, objectively, desired iscompressed datato yield maximalcurrent.
A lemma of Q♭ seeks to exploit (with gameplay) the fitness of 🔋e:e statistics [a saturated load-balancing from twistor residues].### ∃ a
transactor between preimaging and imaging. -- Problem: show that ¢ent🪙 homotopy is normalizable. Hint: classifying all fonts should suffice.
/// +The definition of quantum here = 'economically dyadic'.+To
control compliancy.+The overall objective is to find (+
exploit) the fonts. Coverages are used to 'trap' them, whilst classifying 0-bubbles qualifies as brute-force sorting. So, basically, it's fonts vs. foam.+The hypothetical
solution is to resolve the Juke Lemma (ie. fully sequence EGP). QQ can be proven (shown to be true) with identities.
"A QQ proof is like having the masterkey🔑 to the Universe. Someone armed with it can literally charge the world." - 🧑🏿lnq
/// Think of theproofas being like some sort of an engine that powerstwistorspace.
Overview
The quantumquotient always assumes crypto abnormalcy~ (ie. hyper/hypo < 1, and P ≅ BQP).~~ statistical volatility Plainly, it is a query into how much (an estimate) of a given distribution of e:e statistics [hyper/hypo] is optimal (ie. MONEY)(?). In a parimutuel system, the hyper- numerator can remain (hypothetically) asymptotic* iff there exists a hash function (auction) that can bring about perpetual normalization.** This is because the set of
fonts is infinitesimal compared to the total fibor count.
The aim is for a collapsible wave function: persistent/redundant cache-credit idempotence (global cryptocurrent), which [(hyper,hypo) ≅ crypto] would be theoretically achievable with a secure🔐 [sequenced == all 2,028 fonts identified] payload (courtesy of u-u economics). (See Stewc Lemma, stewc tax, string ludology, UUelcome, Starbureiy automaton, The Origamic Symphony🎶, 🧑🏿lnq's Requiem, +list. Compare fusion energy gain factor)
Function map: Q ... Stewc Lemma → ... Pink Poem → γ-proof
united* under Egglepple (originally 'United Under economy') :== the unofficial (yet formal) name for (and trademark of) the jukebox, UUelcome.** Hence the word/name 'link'. (see Fiduciary of Fun, Egglepple, u-u economics)
"Eventually, UUe will cannibalize every (other) economic system." - lnq🧑🏿
|
merchant@ :== an account [client state] that partitions a coupon by accepting ¢ents🪙 (a charge^) in an exchange with a vendor (on a shared "peer-to-peer" router).@@ An
/// Each merchant acts as its own UUallet
To qualify as a merchant (bank=yes), the account must transact a minimum of one (1) coupon* in any given period (2600 seconds), or else it reverts to no bank status.** Active with a
/// A
interface. ^^ hypercurrency Merchants, in turn, residually stabilize (anchor⚓) the tempo.
/// Each merchant acts as its own UUallet host. Merchants activity is represented by inflection points (tips) on a graph of the current.
To qualify as a merchant (bank=yes), the account must transact a minimum of one (1) coupon* in any given period (2600 seconds), or else it reverts to no bank status.** Active with a
value of at least one ¢ent. (see u-u economics)
/// A
vendor may simultaneously be a merchant, and vice versa.