👨🏿‍🦱
Showing posts with label task. Show all posts
Showing posts with label task. Show all posts

/opus

As it pertains to stewcing, an opus [technically, "opus number", as some quotient (1/2028) of the Stewpot] or developus :== a finite stew choreographical instance resulting in a completed typeface mutation. Plainly, an opus is the computation (ie. encrypting STU on a discretized brane*, subjugating some thread) of some partition of Egglepple (ie. movement).** Cellular automata

Each new opus (an event [game]) will commence at the request [draw] of its ballet🩰, thereby instantiating a unique node (trunk) on Big-O Tree. Opus conclusion occurs when its 🧩puzzle is solved, and should validate a fibor, which is to be then readied for kernel registration.

Depending on its texture, an opus may be referred to as an opera@, operetta (diminutive), or opéra-ballet🩰 (ob).@@ Which is technically a kernel's logic path or operation (a walk involving non-impresarial decision-making).
/// Actually, an opus may overlap with, but is of a different genus than a developus.

An opus is a method of cataloging a stewc (much like with symphonies, operas, regular pieces, etc.). Publication assignment gives opus sets a maximum of six-hundred seventy-six (676) [corresponding to the alphabetical varietals of stew, (A-Z), in binary form]. For example^, a work may be published as "Opus AB, Number 14" (written as Opus AB.14), where "Number 14" - is the fourteenth iteration of the ballet🩰 performed on the loopstring➿, "AB" (its port - the letters of the start and stop leaves, respectively).^^ Default opus is #LS.35[64].

For all intents and purposes, opus titles say, "font size by font weight". Each iteration itself may also be nested (eg. "Opus AB, no.14c"). (see toonage, mixtape)
TOS /// Iterations are basically variations of pencil✏️ quantities, and by necessity, stew count. In nesting, we let p stand for 'pencil✏️', and s stand for 'stew'. The opus' title and number remain as is; they are established. The iteration only changes either the pencil✏️ or stew count. So, for example (purely meant to be hypothetical and unofficial), let Opus GU, No. 4 have a (830 x 4,116) tab. An iteration of this would be Opus GU, No. 4s2885, where the pencil✏️ count (830) is unchanged and the stew count has been reduced to 2,885. Or, we could have Opus GU, No.4p910, where the stew count (4,116) remains unchanged and the pencil✏️ count has increased to 910. Again, purely hypothetical.

/γ-proof

yesegalo proof, or γ-proof (or just proof), :== a stewcing algorithm mapping some preimage to its image. Proofing substantiates a fibor, thereby providing (its) identity clarification.!!! While also helping us draw up better heuristics. The opposite of a proof is an error. Each proof involves patching two (2) genera in T: yesegalo↔🍄meshroom.^^^ A framework for conduction: does a ballet groove with(in) the Symphony🎶?

γ-proofing tasks: determine the efficiency of an EGP encryption [ie. solve the given puzzle🧩; is the resulting fibor economical (fit within the handicap)|(u,u)=0|?].

The proof itself is scored* as a stereotype (sequenced shapeframe) in some overall random walk.** Proofs of stewc input are published (to the ledger) in stewc notation.

The end🏁 of a proof (solution) should result in the closing🔒 of a string (eg. 0b), ideally a fibor. We endeavor to find the most secure🔐 proofs by improving upon the bounds on classes of twistors. Doing so aids our MONEY-making. (see stewc notation, crypto, mathematical proof, proof.m)
/// As with the traditional printing press, the primary reason for proofing is to provide confirmation/verification that a job (done) is accurate. Doing so draws a consensus (from independent, third-party sources -- read: stewcers) for the creation of a new standard. It is important to note that proofs are unique (ie. duplication is forbidden on the circuit). All proofs are published to the ledger.
Function map: loopstring➿γ-proofMONEYquantumquotient

/task authoring