- dyadic (u,u)-compliant casino -
Sponsor: lnq | Policy area(s): economics, energy๐ | Referred to: DOE, MSL, W&M | Action: ๐ฏ๐ณ️initiative
--------
Using the UUe jukebox as the exemplary appliance (in this case an abi), the article (plus any companion media, such as models) explicitly entails* concepts and an intuition for a scenario with all nodes compliant with a flexible tax code (as would be necessary when juking at-scale).** Its main achievement is demonstration of the UUelcome battery.
Photo/cover image of duck [Anatidae] courtesy ©Robin Poole
DUCK approaches cybernetics on two (2) fronts. On one front, it demonstrates how to use the game (juking) for optimizing ludology. On the other front, it expands - as a byproduct - on a core outline of essentials for economic fitness (per proofing).
If I'm being completely real and honest, I have no prior experience (this is my first time) bringing forth any legislation for review on any level. Removing hubris from the equation, people think/thought (myself included) that ties I may have to the federal government should translate well over civic edifices. The maxim, 'all politics is local', doesn't carry weight here because this needs to |
Cheers.
PREAMBLE
DUCK's thesis is that cybernetics is a requisite to having the jukebox becoming a public utility (a central aspect of civil engineering), and hence, cybernetics are imperative for system autonomy (scalable subject input). More succinctly, it outlines how to bring cybernetic compliance (ie. sport at scale) to bear upon solving the Quantumquotient. To that end, one ambition is to have absolute kernel usage compliancy.๐จ๐ฟ๐ฆฑ