lnq 👨🏿‍🦱: task
👨🏿‍🦱
Showing posts with label task. Show all posts
Showing posts with label task. Show all posts

/ γ-proof

A yesegalo proof, or γ-proof (or just proof), :== a >stewcing algorithm mapping some preimage to its image. Proofing substantiates a fibor, thereby providing (its) identity clarification.!!! While also helping us draw up better heuristics. The opposite of a proof is an error. Each proof involves patching two (2) genera in T: yesegalo↔🍄meshroom.^^^ A framework for conduction: does a ballet groove with(in) the Symphony🎶?

γ-proofing tasks: determine the efficiency of an EGP encryption [ie. solve the given puzzle🧩; is the resulting fibor economical (fit within the handicap)|(u,u)=0|?].

The proof itself is scored* as a stereotype (sequenced shapeframe) in some overall random walk.** Proofs of stewc input are published (to the ledger) in stewc notation.

The end🏁 of a proof (solution) should result in the closing🔒 of a string (eg. 0b), ideally a fibor. We endeavor to find the most secure🔐 proofs by improving upon the bounds on classes of twistors. Doing so aids our MONEY-making. (see stewc notation, crypto, mathematical proof, proof.m)
/// As with the traditional printing press, the primary reason for proofing is to provide confirmation/verification that a job (done) is accurate. Doing so draws a consensus (from independent, third-party sources -- read: stewcers) for the creation of a new standard. It is important to note that proofs are unique (ie. duplication is forbidden on the circuit). All proofs are published to the ledger.
Function map: loopstring➿γ-proofMONEYquantumquotient

/ opus

As it pertains to stewcing, an opus [technically, "opus number", as some quotient (1/676) of stewart] or developus :== a finite stew choreographical instance resulting in a completed typeface mutation. Plainly, an opus is the computation (ie. encrypting LNQ on a discretized brane*, subjugating some thread) of some partition of Egglepple (ie. movement).** Cellular automata

Each new opus (an event [game]) will commence at the request [draw] of its ballet, thereby instantiating a unique node (trunk) on Big-O Tree. Opus conclusion occurs when its 🧩puzzle is solved, and should validate a fibor, which is to be then readied for kernel registration.

Depending on its texture, an opus may be referred to as an opera@, operetta (diminutive), or opéra-ballet (ob).@@ Which is technically a kernel's logic path or operation (a walk involving non-impresarial decision-making).
/// Actually, an opus may overlap with, but is of a different genus than a developus.

An opus is a method of cataloging a juke (much like with symphonies, operas, regular pieces, etc.). Publication assignment gives opus sets a maximum of six-hundred seventy-six (676) [corresponding to the alphabetical varietals of stew, (A-Z), in binary form]. For example^, a work may be published as "Opus AB, Number 14" (written as Opus AB.14), where "Number 14" - is the fourteenth iteration of the ballet performed on the loopstring, "AB" (its port - the letters of the start and stop leaves, respectively).^^ Default opus is #LS.35[64].

For all intents and purposes, opus titles say, "font size by font weight". Each iteration itself may also be nested (eg. "Opus AB, no.14c"). (see toonage, mixtape)
TOS /// Iterations are basically variations of pencil quantities, and by necessity, font count. In nesting, we let p stand for 'pencil', and f stand for 'font'. The opus' title and number remain as is; they are established. The iteration only changes either the pencil or font count. So, for example (purely meant to be hypothetical and unofficial), let Opus GU, No. 4 have a (830 x 4,116) tab. An iteration of this would be Opus GU, No. 4f2885, where the pencil count (830) is unchanged and the font count has been reduced to 2,885. Or, we could have Opus GU, No.4p910, where the font count (4,116) remains unchanged and the pencil count has increased to 910. Again, purely hypothetical.

/ task authoring