/ Funshine/Toonlight [load-store] 🔋

Respective of Stewsday's playtime meridiems, am = 'funshine' (upload) and pm = 'toonlight' (download), scheduled streaming for UUelcome is nested [t⊆f⊃t] as 🌞Funshine↔🌚Toonlight :== declares the event loop➰ cycle stacking MB/MA registers.

"Plugging into a tree is like being plugged into the Sun."🌳🔌🌞 - 🧑🏿lnq

Alternatively - energy🔋-wise^@ - generated current from photovoltaic sources (ie. solar energy / ambient luminosity) is called 'funshine', whereas the store and load shifting of said energy (for later usage) at off-solar time is called 'toonlight'.@@ For powering the stream. (see Funshine/Toonlight (song), Puwun, toonage, FUN Formula, Egglepple, everywhere!, u-u economics, nut)
/// +In actuality, there really is no temporal slicing here. I can stream at any time, at all hours🕕 of the day, so the playoff can seem omnipresent.
+Here, the word 'funshine' is partially derived from the word 'fusion' (the nuclear physical process by which two or more nuclei reactants are combined to create energy), although 'toonlight' may be more applicable.
+Since my 2-fold approach to energy-scaling is via cellular automata, this can provide fusion mimicry: the cells are used (as chargers) for their photosynthetic storage capablities during downtime. In any case, funshine is preferred due to portability/mobility, which likely wouldn't be the case if vegetation🌳 (ie. series of plants = the grid🔌) were the sole solution.

/ caloric compliance

Instigator: 🧑🏿Link Starbureiy
Caloric compliance (calcom) :== compliance (courtesy of some automaton^@) afforded by normalization, with intent to sustain net energy🔋🔌. @@ A jukebox.
/// +Keep in mind that cyply is simultaneously kinetic and ephemeral. The purpose of this auction is to induce entropy ('clock'⏱) via token sessions and timestamps.
+Any parimutuel system will relate dyads. What makes it technically cybernetic in this case is that the dyad [(a.) currency generation ≡ (b.) energy cost] is homologically conjoined endpoints comprising an inductive feedback loop➰ (ie. e + 1).

definition: Government is a local representation of its parent macro.
definition: Governance is a formal system (of processes) that normalizes markets.
ideal: heat map-based taxation applied to civic structures.

theorem
Governance is inherently insecure (ie. spreads are not uniformly covered -- tax coding is theoretically organic and morphometric), but can be eased quantitatively.

"The only real money in the world is tax revenue." - 🧑🏿lnq

-Calcom posits that the optimal path to security🔐 is with centralized (ie. supervised/automated discrete parameters of a high-dimensional sparsity) dyadically-idempotent products (ie. swap any and all currencies based against crypto^&) which are backed by proof-of-work or proof-of-spacetime.&& In this case, link is the money supply. It is suggested that this be done via a utility where energy cost recovery (per cell) is a recursive function of compliance [argument: all nodes benefit from excise* distribution].** The product/good is fibor. This is a cryptocurrent tax (ie. derivative revenue collected) in scenarios of regulatory convertibility.

"Fundamentally, a civilization's problems are rooted in energy development." - 🧑🏿lnq

Calcom exploits an 'electrolyte' (ie. our integrated 🔋energy^@-scaling game engine that powers the following compute:= solve + run Q♯🎶) to cellularly automate threading^{^} in a stream within some loop➰ cycle.@@ spontaneous egg-epp reactivity ^^ Non-presumptuous forking via promotion and relegation controlled by a rating system ["reputation"].
/// +The first order of operation is battery/capacitor🔋 development (chemistry-current-conduction [electrodes]-compute-convert). ← Everything starts with/revolves around growth+maintenance of the battery (what powers the stream); crypto secures🔒 cell iteration/tessellation.

"Game the world.🎮🌍 Whoever adopts the tax is winning." - 🧑🏿lnq

I call this pic 'Walking on Mars', but it's really just me stepping through the Bison Range, MT. Peep the 👟kicks.😶

Calcom theatrics (climbing ↑* the Kardashev scale [K-scale]) span validating✔ the formula of cryptocommodity as a method of rewarding participants on the network.** The primary reason we're scaling is due to the energy demands of composing Q♯🎶. Net energy / energy development will happen by default. This is a playoff between fiat (government-issued) currencies and their 🧩crypto (proof-of-work) counterparts, which could, in theory, make MONEY (universally) parimutuel (ie. hyper↔hypo).

To accomplish this would take either a treasuries decree converting non-cybernetic compliance instances at the revenue level (with UUe as the house), or extremally large-scale mass participation (in terms of its mobile network's nodal saturation) in a heterotic container consisting of a virtual economy from which seigniorage - as an excise [Classified as a credit] - subsidizes utilities. Both can be pursued simultaneously where cellular automation handles an elastic deposit scheduler. (see non-cybernetic compliance, DUCC🦆, u-u economics)
/// The idea behind the heterosis is that virtuality affords freedom of activity as well as intrinsic transaction, however, the platformer (governing body) bills according to grid usage (compliance). -- A zero-sum game (ie. nobody loses; everyone's needs are met).
Function map: parimutuel ⊂ quotient normalization ↔ cybernetic compliance

/ crypto

In general, crypto refers to a 🧩puzzle that lends itself to a cipher (some unsecured🔓 function space secured🔐 by an algorithm or quantum phenomena). By definition, its reward function, if any, is backed by proof-of-work or proof-of-space.
/// +Technically, it's the proof-of-work that makes something crypto.
+We assume that such a function space is insecure🔓 (randomized), and crypo exists to stabilize it.

As it specifically relates to UUe, crypto is a synonym for 'statistical estimation to an actual yield' (¢ent🪙-energy🔋 conversion), as calculated from the ¢ent🪙 formula and its hash complexities. Juking helps ensure fitness (ie. core efficiency) [:= data compression relative to spontaneous egg-epp reactivity🔋 ≜ (file size vs. energy usage)]. (see cryptocommodity, cryptocurrency, cryptosport, crypto compliance, crypto normalization, mathematics, bug)

/ e:e statistics

(see play, Egglepple, hypocurrency, quantumquotient, link)

/ egg

As c=2^(b-1)/2 {b∈ℤ→26, /max=25 (0-25) || b = brane count [which is of the sesquilinear form (e^-,e⁺)]}, an egg is the coverage's resultant as an integer spin statistic (positive parity[⁺]).

start leaf (see epp, Egglepple, play)
/// +The formula is in direct correlation to spin-statistics. So, for example, when b is odd, say b=7, then c(=8) is an integer-spin (egg). When b is even, say b=4, then c(=2.82842712+) is a half-integer-spin (epp). The rational portion (floating point) of half-integer statistics contributes to seigniorage. Obviously, any negative value for b will yield an epp. (see juke tax)
+Yes, there are twenty-six (26) integer values here; we denote "0" as (0^-,0⁺) → having both negative(-) and positive(+) polarity in twistorspace. For instance, -12 ... (0^-,0⁺) ... +12 = [26]. The total number of coverages, c, is an upperbound for points on a curve, and so its number line must include 0 (hence 0 through 25). However, because any b=0 gives nonsensical values [error codes], the zeroes are discounted, and lower and upper bounds are just eleven (11). The minima (cover-0 = -11) is 0.015625 and the maxima (cover-25 = +11) is 32.

/ epp

As c=2^(b-1)/2 {b∈ℤ→26, /max=25 (0-25) || b = brane count [which is of the sesquilinear form (e^-,e⁺)]}, an epp is the coverage's resultant as a half-integer spin statistic (negative parity[^-]).

The theory of epps is earl. stop leaf (see egg, Egglepple, play)
/// +The formula is in direct correlation to spin-statistics. So, for example, when b is odd, say b=5, then c(=4) is an integer-spin (egg). When b is even, say b=8, then c(=11.3137085+) is a half-integer-spin (epp). The rational portion (floating point) of half-integer statistics contributes to seigniorage. Obviously, any negative value for b will yield an epp. (see juke tax)
+Yes, there are twenty-six (26) integer values here; we denote "0" as (0^-,0⁺) → having both negative(-) and positive(+) polarity in twistorspace. For instance, -12 ... (0^-,0⁺) ... +12 = [26]. The total number of coverages, c, is an upperbound for points on a curve, and so its number line must include 0 (hence 0 through 25). However, because any b=0 gives nonsensical values [error codes], the zeroes are discounted, and lower and upper bounds are just eleven (11). The minima (cover-0 = -11) is 0.015625 and the maxima (cover-25 = +11) is 32.

/ New Power Generator 🔋🔌

(see DUCC🦆)